Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare

Abstract

Purpose: Electromagnetic interference (EMI) with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can cause oversensing and subsequently inappropriate ICD therapies. We retrospectively investigated the current incidence and clinical relevance of oversensing related EMI in a large cohort of ICD patients.

Methods: From January 2005 to April 2013, all ICD interrogations performed at our institution were analyzed for the occurrence of oversensing related EMI. EMI episodes were classified as clinically significant, potentially significant or of minor significance. To identify risk factors for EMI, we also analyzed different lead models in our cohort (integrated vs true bipolar leads).

Results: Data of 2940 ICD patients (mean age 63 ± 16 years, 2322 male patients, 7772 patient-years) were retrospectively analyzed for the occurrence of EMI. During the observation period, a total of 145 (hospital environment n = 97, non-hospital environment n = 48) episodes occurred and resulted in an overall EMI incidence, i.e. event rate, of 1.87 % per patient per year. Focusing on clinically significant or potentially significant episodes, the EMI incidence was 0.27 % per patient per year. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant higher hazard of oversensing for patients with integrated bipolar leads compared to patients with true bipolar leads (HR = 2.21; 95 % CI 0.90-5.39; p = 0.083).

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that EMI continues to occur in everyday life. Patients should be well informed about the potential sources and risks of EMI but they need not be overly concerned since the risk of EMI-especially in a non-hospital environment-is low.

Keywords: Electromagnetic interference (EMI); ICD therapy; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD); Ventricular oversensing.