Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography
- PMID: 26827979
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography
Abstract
Introduction: The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate facial asymmetry 3 dimensionally using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and (2) compare the right and left facial hard and soft tissues volumetrically and their interferences on each other.
Methods: The CBCT data of 49 asymmetric (soft tissue menton deviation, ≥4 mm; distance from the facial midline) (mean age, 19.9 ± 5.6 years) and 39 symmetric patients (soft tissue menton deviation, <4 mm) (mean age, 17.8 ± 5.5 years) were exported to the MIMICS software program (version 13.0; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Linear, surface distance, angular, volumetric, and surface area measurements were performed 3 dimensionally to assess and compare intragroup and intergroup differences.
Results: In the asymmetry group, linear measurements such as ramus height, mandibular effective and corpus length, and absolute mandibular volumetric measurements were significantly decreased (P <0.001), whereas facial mandibular, and soft and hard tissue volumetric measurements made on 3-dimensional images, and linear measurements on 2-dimensional images were increased (P <0.001) on the deviation side.
Conclusions: Facial hard and soft tissue asymmetries can be precisely quantified using CBCT. However, especially in the gonial region where the surface topography shows alterations caused by asymmetry, many anatomic landmarks should be chosen for the assessment of asymmetry. At the gonial level, the compensation of the soft tissues for the hard tissues was found on 2-dimensional images; nevertheless, 3-dimensional right and left volumetric soft tissue evaluations provide evidence for asymmetry.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Authors' response.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Dec;150(6):910-911. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.015. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27894535 No abstract available.
-
Criteria for determining facial asymmetries.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Dec;150(6):910. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.018. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27894536 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135. Epub 2011 Jul 16. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 21763045
-
Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):38-47. doi: 10.2319/112112-890.1. Epub 2013 Jun 11. Angle Orthod. 2014. PMID: 23758600 Free PMC article.
-
Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.027. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 21055586
-
[Evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry based on cone-beam CT image].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013 Feb 18;45(1):156-61. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013. PMID: 23411540 Review. Chinese.
-
Radiographic and diagnostic approaches for mandibular asymmetries in orthodontic practice: a narrative review.J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jul;48(4):1-15. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.073. Epub 2024 Jul 3. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024. PMID: 39087209 Review.
Cited by
-
Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jul;26(7):4947-4966. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04463-4. Epub 2022 Mar 23. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 35320382 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in facial soft tissue deviations in Class III patients with different types of mandibular asymmetry: A cone-beam computed tomography study.Korean J Orthod. 2023 Nov 25;53(6):402-419. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.106. Epub 2023 Sep 7. Korean J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 37989577 Free PMC article.
-
Hard and Soft Tissue Asymmetry in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;13(5):869. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050869. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36900013 Free PMC article.
-
Lip line changes in Class III facial asymmetry patients after orthodontic camouflage treatment, one-jaw surgery, and two-jaw surgery: A preliminary study.Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):239-245. doi: 10.2319/033016-254.1. Epub 2016 Aug 16. Angle Orthod. 2017. PMID: 27529732 Free PMC article.
-
The three-dimensional morphology of mandible and glenoid fossa as contributing factors to menton deviation in facial asymmetry-retrospective study.Prog Orthod. 2020 Sep 22;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00335-3. Prog Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32959138 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources