Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 1;11(2):e0138526.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138526. eCollection 2016.

Economic Cost of Campylobacter, Norovirus and Rotavirus Disease in the United Kingdom

Affiliations

Economic Cost of Campylobacter, Norovirus and Rotavirus Disease in the United Kingdom

Clarence C Tam et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the annual cost to patients, the health service and society of infectious intestinal disease (IID) from Campylobacter, norovirus and rotavirus.

Design: Secondary data analysis.

Setting: The United Kingdom population, 2008-9.

Main outcome measures: Cases and frequency of health services usage due to these three pathogens; associated healthcare costs; direct, out-of-pocket expenses; indirect costs to patients and caregivers.

Results: The median estimated costs to patients and the health service at 2008-9 prices were: Campylobacter £50 million (95% CI: £33m-£75m), norovirus £81 million (95% CI: £63m-£106m), rotavirus £25m (95% CI: £18m-£35m). The costs per case were approximately £30 for norovirus and rotavirus, and £85 for Campylobacter. This was mostly borne by patients and caregivers through lost income or out-of-pocket expenditure. The cost of Campylobacter-related Guillain-Barré syndrome hospitalisation was £1.26 million (95% CI: £0.4m-£4.2m).

Conclusions: Norovirus causes greater economic burden than Campylobacter and rotavirus combined. Efforts to control IID must prioritise norovirus. For Campylobacter, estimated costs should be considered in the context of expenditure to control this pathogen in agriculture, food production and retail. Our estimates, prior to routine rotavirus immunisation in the UK, provide a baseline vaccine cost-effectiveness analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Estimated cases, healthcare consultations and hospitalisations due to Campylobacter, norovirus and rotavirus disease in the United Kingdom, 2008–9.
Area of circles is proportional to the estimated number of cases.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Estimated costs to patients and the health service due to Campylobacter, norovirus and rotavirus disease in the United Kingdom, 2008–9.
Area of circles is proportional to the estimated cost

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tam CC, Rodrigues LC, Viviani L, Dodds JP, Evans MR, Hunter PR, et al. Longitudinal study of infectious intestinal disease in the UK (IID2 study): incidence in the community and presenting to general practice. Gut 2012;61:69–77. 10.1136/gut.2011.238386 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts JA, Cumberland P, Sockett PN, Wheeler J, Rodrigues LC, Sethi D, et al. The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: socio-economic impact. Epidemiol Infect 2003;130:1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amar CFL, East CL, Gray J, Iturriza-Gomara M, Maclure EA, McLauchlin J. Detection by PCR of eight groups of enteric pathogens in 4,627 faecal samples: re-examination of the English case-control Infectious Intestinal Disease Study (1993–1996). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;26:311–23. - PubMed
    1. Phillips G, Lopman B, Tam CC, Iturriza-Gomara M, Brown D, Gray J. Diagnosing norovirus-associated infectious intestinal disease using viral load. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:63 10.1186/1471-2334-9-63 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wheeler JG, Sethi D, Cowden JM, Wall PG, Rodrigues LC, Tompkins DS, et al. Study of infectious intestinal disease in England: rates in the community, presenting to general practice and reported to national surveillance. BMJ 1999;318:1046–50. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms