The Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry: Purpose and Development
- PMID: 26829344
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000254
The Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry: Purpose and Development
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem that negatively impacts women's quality of life. A variety of surgeries exist for POP treatment, including procedures performed with and without mesh augmentation. The growing use of mesh in prolapse surgeries in the 2000s was associated with increasing reports of complications, resulting in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safety Notifications, and in 2012, the FDA ordered transvaginal mesh manufacturers to conduct prospective studies to evaluate longer-term outcomes. These requirements provided incentives and an environment conducive to collaboration. American Urogynecologic Society leaders collaborated with device manufacturers, the FDA, and other professional organizations to establish the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry (PFDR), a collection of interrelated registries, which could meet manufacturers' needs but also allow surgeons to track individual and aggregate outcomes for quality improvement. The PFDR was developed and launched by American Urogynecologic Society with objectives of (1) collecting, storing, and analyzing clinical data related to POP treatment; (2) establishing common data elements and quality metrics; and (3) providing a framework for external stakeholders to conduct POP research. The PFDR includes industry-sponsored studies, as well as 2 options for volunteer registry participation, the PFDR-Quality Improvement and PFDR-Research. The PFDR promotes quality improvement and national benchmarking and will provide real-world comparative safety and effectiveness data for prolapse surgeries. The PFDR can serve as a model for collaboration between medical practitioners, researchers, industry, and federal agencies and may allow progress toward our similar goal of high-quality surgical care of women with prolapse.
Similar articles
-
Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry: Study Design and Outcome Measures.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):70-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000237. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID: 26825404
-
Restriction of Surgical Options for Pelvic Floor Disorders.Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 May 1;30(5):467-475. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001507. Epub 2024 Apr 10. Urogynecology (Phila). 2024. PMID: 38683201
-
Registries as Tools for Clinical Excellence and the Development of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016 Mar;43(1):121-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.006. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016. PMID: 26880512 Review.
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in Academic Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Urology Practice in the Setting of the Food and Drug Administration Public Health Notifications.Urology. 2016 May;91:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.057. Epub 2016 Feb 1. Urology. 2016. PMID: 26845051
-
Transvaginal mesh: a historical review and update of the current state of affairs in the United States.Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Apr;28(4):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3092-7. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Int Urogynecol J. 2017. PMID: 27549225 Review.
Cited by
-
Generic Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Seeking Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):337-343. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001069. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021. PMID: 34080581 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures.Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2213-2221. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03099-x. Epub 2022 Feb 3. Qual Life Res. 2022. PMID: 35113307 Free PMC article.
-
Landscape of Cardiovascular Device Registries in the United States.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jun 4;8(11):e012756. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012756. Epub 2019 Jun 1. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31433706 Free PMC article.
-
Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process.BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 6;7(12):e017125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017125. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29212782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term active surveillance of implantable medical devices: an analysis of factors determining whether current registries are adequate to expose safety and efficacy problems.BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019 Jul 3;1(1):e000011. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000011. eCollection 2019. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019. PMID: 35047775 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical