Visual Outcomes and Accommodative Response of the Lumina Accommodative Intraocular Lens
- PMID: 26829595
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.01.006
Visual Outcomes and Accommodative Response of the Lumina Accommodative Intraocular Lens
Abstract
Purpose: To compare visual acuity, accommodation, and contrast sensitivity of the AkkoLens Lumina accommodative intraocular lens (AkkoLens Clinical b.v., Breda, The Netherlands) with a standard monofocal intraocular lens (IOL).
Design: Randomized clinical trial.
Methods: The study enrolled 86 eyes with cataract that all required cataract surgery and IOL implantation. The study group included 61 eyes that were implanted with the Lumina. The control group included 25 eyes that were implanted with an Acrysof SA60AT (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA) monofocal IOL. The distance and near visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, and accommodation were measured over a 1-year follow-up period. Accommodation was measured subjectively, using defocus curves, and objectively, with an open-field autorefractor.
Results: Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities did not differ significantly between the groups (P ≥ .21) over the 12 months. However, the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was 0.07 ± 0.08 logRAD for the Lumina group and 0.37 ± 0.19 logRAD for the control group (P < .01) and the corrected distance near visual acuity (CDNVA) was 0.11 ± 0.12 LogRAD for the Lumina group and 0.41 ± 0.15 LogRAD for the control group (P < .01). Defocus curves showed a statistically significant difference between groups for defocus ranging from -4.50 to -0.50 diopters (D) (P < .01) with significantly higher visual acuities for the Lumina group. Subjective accommodation, as determined from defocus curves, was 3.05 ± 1.06, 3.87 ± 1.27, and 5.59 ± 1.02 D for the Lumina group and 1.46 ± 0.54, 2.00 ± 0.52, and 3.67 ± 0.75 D for the control group at visual acuities of 0.10, 0.20, and 0.4 logMAR for both groups, respectively. The objective accommodation, measured by an open-field autorefractor, was 0.63 ± 0.41, 0.69 ± 0.45, 0.91 ± 0.51, and 1.27 ± 0.76 D for the Lumina group and 0.10 ± 0.15, 0.12 ± 0.15, -0.06 ± 0.09 and 0.07 ± 0.10 D for the control group at accommodation stimuli of 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0 D, respectively. Contrast sensitivity was the same for both groups (P ≥ .26).
Conclusions: The Lumina accommodative IOL effectively restores the visual function, accommodation, and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with no influence on the postoperative contrast sensitivity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of Accommodative Performance of a New Accommodative Intraocular Lens.J Refract Surg. 2018 Feb 1;34(2):78-83. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20171205-01. J Refract Surg. 2018. PMID: 29425385 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;150(5):619-627.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Aug 16. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20719298 Clinical Trial.
-
One-Year Outcomes of the Phase III Clinical Study on the Lumina Accommodative Intraocular Lens.J Refract Surg. 2025 Apr;41(4):e374-e381. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250305-02. Epub 2025 Apr 1. J Refract Surg. 2025. PMID: 40197071 Clinical Trial.
-
Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;245(4):473-89. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0391-6. Epub 2006 Aug 30. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 16944188 Review.
-
Potentially accommodating 1CU intraocular lens: 1-year results in 553 eyes and literature review.J Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;23(2):159-71. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070201-08. J Refract Surg. 2007. PMID: 17326355 Review.
Cited by
-
Methods for evaluating quality of life and vision in patients undergoing lens refractive surgery.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;257(6):1091-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04270-w. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30824995 Review.
-
Introducing Dynamic Stimulation Aberrometry: Binocular Objective Accommodation versus Subjective Measures.Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Apr 13;3(4):100309. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100309. eCollection 2023 Dec. Ophthalmol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37250923 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of premium intraocular lenses on presbyopia treatments.Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2022 Feb 23;2(1):100042. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100042. eCollection 2022 May-Jun. Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2022. PMID: 37846220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):121-140. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_53_18. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 30294526 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reply to the letter to the editor.Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Dec 9;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00271-1. Eye Vis (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34886914 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical