Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):64-8.
doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.173761.

Factors influencing challenging colonoscopies during anesthesiologist-assisted deep sedation

Affiliations

Factors influencing challenging colonoscopies during anesthesiologist-assisted deep sedation

Fabrizio Cardin et al. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background/aim: Increased demand for colon cancer screening procedures can significantly impact on routine colonoscopy management at dedicated facilities, prompting a review of the factors that can negatively affect workflow. Although potential adverse effects and impact on costs of deep sedation have been documented elsewhere, this study focuses on variables that can influence performance of colonoscopy in deep sedation and interfere with normal procedure scheduling in settings where the presence of an anesthesiologist is mandatory.

Patients and methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of the activities of a colonoscopy screening unit, applying Bayesian Network (BN) analysis, designed to assess interdependencies among variables that can affect a process in complex, multidimensional systems. The study was performed at a teaching hospital where endoscopists and anesthesiologists of varying work experience operate on a rota basis. During a six-month period, we analyzed 1485 consecutive colonoscopies performed under deep propofol sedation, administered by an anesthesiologist via hand-controlled syringe. The BN was constructed with the variables: Gender, age, ASA status, bowel preparation, baseline blood pressure, endoscopist's experience, anesthesiologist's experience, presence of polypectomy, and the target node, "challenging procedure." This previously undefined category refers to any events disrupting the scheduled rota.

Result and conclusion: Two distinct networks were identified. One deals mainly with relationships among the variables, patients' demographic and clinical characteristics (procedures with polypectomy, ASA and baseline blood pressure). The other explains relationships among the variables, "challenging procedure," bowel preparation, and endoscopist's experience. The factors associated with the anesthesiologist's activity do not influence challenging colonoscopies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bayesian network

References

    1. Twombly R. Recommendations raise workload issues for colon cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:348–50. - PubMed
    1. Price J, Campbell C, Sells J, Weller D, Campbell H, Kenicer M, et al. Impact of UK colorectal cancer screening pilot on hospital diagnostic services. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005;27:246–53. - PubMed
    1. Marcus SN. Efficiency in endoscopy centers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:765–7. - PubMed
    1. Cardin F, Minicuci N, Andreotti A, Pinetti E, Campigotto F, Donà BM, et al. Maximizing the general success of cecal intubation during propofol sedation in a multi-endoscopist academic centre. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dubé C. Sedation practices in Canada: A propos de propofol. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25:253–4. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources