Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Feb 1;6(2):e008292.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008292.

Supporting breastfeeding In Local Communities (SILC) in Victoria, Australia: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Supporting breastfeeding In Local Communities (SILC) in Victoria, Australia: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Helen L McLachlan et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Breastfeeding has significant health benefits for mothers and infants. Despite recommendations from the WHO, by 6 months of age 40% of Australian infants are receiving no breast milk. Increased early postpartum breastfeeding support may improve breastfeeding maintenance. 2 community-based interventions to increase breastfeeding duration in local government areas (LGAs) in Victoria, Australia, were implemented and evaluated.

Design: 3-arm cluster randomised trial.

Setting: LGAs in Victoria, Australia.

Participants: LGAs across Victoria with breastfeeding initiation rates below the state average and > 450 births/year were eligible for inclusion. The LGA was the unit of randomisation, and maternal and child health centres in the LGAs comprised the clusters.

Interventions: Early home-based breastfeeding support by a maternal and child health nurse (home visit, HV) with or without access to a community-based breastfeeding drop-in centre (HV+drop-in).

Main outcome measures: The proportion of infants receiving 'any' breast milk at 3, 4 and 6 months (women's self-report).

Findings: 4 LGAs were randomised to the comparison arm and provided usual care (n=41 clusters; n=2414 women); 3 to HV (n=32 clusters; n=2281 women); and 3 to HV+drop-in (n=26 clusters; 2344 women). There was no difference in breastfeeding at 4 months in either HV (adjusted OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.29) or HV+drop-in (adjusted OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.08) compared with the comparison arm, no difference at 3 or 6 months, nor in any LGA in breastfeeding before and after the intervention. Some issues were experienced with intervention protocol fidelity.

Conclusions: Early home-based and community-based support proved difficult to implement. Interventions to increase breastfeeding in complex community settings require sufficient time and partnership building for successful implementation. We cannot conclude that additional community-based support is ineffective in improving breastfeeding maintenance given the level of adherence to the planned protocol.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12611000898954; Results.

Keywords: NUTRITION & DIETETICS; PUBLIC HEALTH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow chart (LGA, local government area; MCH, maternal and child health; SILC, Supporting breastfeeding In Local Communities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary outcome data collection question, asked at routine 4-month maternal and child health visit.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Any breast milk feeding at 4 months of age at baseline and post-intervention in all local government areas (LGAs). Baseline: n=397 in comparison arm; n=482 in home visit arm; n=475 in home visit plus drop-in centre arm. Intervention: n=1300 in comparison arm; n=1429 in home visit arm; n=1276 in home visit plus drop-in centre arm.

References

    1. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Breastfeeding on the Worldwide Agenda: findings from a landscape analysis on political commitment for programmes to protect, promote and support breastfeeding. New York, NY, USA, 2013.
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council. Infant Feeding Guidelines: information for health workers. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2012. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Expert consultation on the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Conclusions and recommendations. Secondary expert consultation on the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Conclusions and recommendations, 2001. http://www.who.int/inf-pr-2001/en/note2001–07.html
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2010 Australian National Infant Feeding Survey: indicator results. Canberra: AIHW, 2011.
    1. Amir LH, Donath SM. Socioeconomic status and rates of breastfeeding in Australia: evidence from three recent national health surveys. Med J Aust 2008;189:254–6. - PubMed

Publication types