Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;20(8):2211-2220.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1734-2. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods

Affiliations

Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods

Do-Gyoon Kim et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the current study was to examine whether the nanoindentation parameters can assess the alteration of bone quality resulting from different degrees of bone remodeling between bone tissue ages around the dental implant interface with different treatments and healing periods.

Materials and methods: Dental implants were placed in mandibles of six male dogs. Treatment groups included: resorbable blast media-treated titanium (Ti) implants, alumina-blasted zirconia implants (ATZ), alumina-blasted zirconia implants applied with demineralized bone matrix (ATZ-D), and alumina-blasted zirconia implants applied with rhBMP-2 (ATZ-B). Nanoindentation modulus (E), hardness (H), viscosity (η), and viscoelastic creep (Creep/P max) were measured for new and old bone tissues adjacent to the implants at 3 and 6 weeks of post-implantation. A total of 945 indentations were conducted for 32 implant systems.

Results: Significantly lower E, H, and η but higher Creep/P max were measured for new bone tissues than old bone tissues, independent of treatments at both healing periods (p < 0.001). All nanoindentation parameters were not significantly different between healing periods (p > 0.568). ATZ-D and ATZ-B implants had the stiffer slope of correlation between E and Creep/P max of the new bone tissue than Ti implant (p < 0.039).

Conclusions: Current results indicated that, in addition to elastic modulus and plastic hardness, measurement of viscoelastic properties of bone tissue surrounding the implant can provide more detailed information to understand mechanical behavior of an implant system.

Clinical relevance: Ability of energy absorption in the interfacial bone tissue can play a significant role in the long-term success of a dental implant system.

Keywords: Bone morphogenetic protein-2; Bone remodeling; Implant interface; Interfacial bone quality; Nanoindentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Dent Res. 2006 Dec;85(12):1087-91 - PubMed
    1. J Dent Res. 2007 Mar;86(3):237-41 - PubMed
    1. J Biomech. 2010 Jan 19;43(2):287-93 - PubMed
    1. J Biomech. 2005 Jul;38(7):1459-67 - PubMed
    1. Biomaterials. 1997 Oct;18(20):1325-30 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources