Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 25;60(4):2265-72.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02728-15. Print 2016 Apr.

Prediction of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Bloodstream Infections

Affiliations

Prediction of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Bloodstream Infections

Seejil Dan et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Increasing rates of fluoroquinolone resistance (FQ-R) have limited empirical treatment options for Gram-negative infections, particularly in patients with severe beta-lactam allergy. This case-control study aims to develop a clinical risk score to predict the probability of FQ-R in Gram-negative bloodstream isolates. Adult patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSI) hospitalized at Palmetto Health System in Columbia, South Carolina, from 2010 to 2013 were identified. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for FQ-R. Point allocation in the fluoroquinolone resistance score (FQRS) was based on regression coefficients. Model discrimination was assessed by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among 824 patients with Gram-negative BSI, 143 (17%) had BSI due to fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible Gram-negative bacilli. Independent risk factors for FQ-R and point allocation in FQRS included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.97; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.36 to 2.98; 1 point), diabetes mellitus (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.28; 1 point), residence at a skilled nursing facility (aOR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.42 to 3.63; 2 points), outpatient procedure within 30 days (aOR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.96 to 6.78; 3 points), prior fluoroquinolone use within 90 days (aOR, 7.87; 95% CI, 4.53 to 13.74; 5 points), or prior fluoroquinolone use within 91 to 180 days of BSI (aOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.17 to 6.16; 3 points). The AUC for both final logistic regression and FQRS models was 0.73. Patients with an FQRS of 0, 3, 5, or 8 had predicted probabilities of FQ-R of 6%, 22%, 39%, or 69%, respectively. The estimation of patient-specific risk of antimicrobial resistance using FQRS may improve empirical antimicrobial therapy and fluoroquinolone utilization in Gram-negative BSI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Receiver operating characteristic plot of the fluoroquinolone resistance score. The black line indicates the receiver operating characteristic curve. The light-colored tangent line highlights the point in the curve that represents the best performance of the model. The area under the curve is 0.73.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Calibration plot of fluoroquinolone resistance score. The observed frequency of fluoroquinolone resistance plotted by deciles of predicted probability from the fluoroquinolone resistance score (black dots) is shown. Perfect calibration is represented by the gray y = x line.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Predicted probability of fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible bloodstream isolates by fluoroquinolone resistance score. The size of the marker for point estimates is weighted approximately by the relative number of subjects with the corresponding score.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Comparison of predicted probabilities of ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible bloodstream isolates by fluoroquinolone resistance score using different MIC susceptibility breakpoint criteria. CLSI, Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (MIC of ≤1); EUCAST, European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (MIC of ≤0.5); USCAST, United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (MIC of ≤0.25 for Enterobacteriaceae and ≤0.5 for nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli).

References

    1. Goto M, Al-Hasan MN. 2013. Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:501–509. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uslan DZ, Crane SJ, Steckelberg JM, Cockerill FR III, St Sauver JL, Wilson WR, Baddour LM. 2007. Age- and sex-associated trends in bloodstream infection: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Arch Intern Med 167:834–839. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.8.834. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bryan CS, Reynolds KL, Brenner ER. 1983. Analysis of 1,186 episodes of Gram-negative bacteremia in non-university hospital: the effects of antimicrobial therapy. Rev Infect Dis 5:629–638. doi:10.1093/clinids/5.4.629. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paul M, Shani V, Muchtar E, Kariv G, Robenshtok E, Leibovici L. 2010. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4851–4863. doi:10.1128/AAC.00627-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Retamar P, Portillo MM, López-Prieto MD, Rodríguez-López F, de Cueto M, García MV, Gómez MJ, Del Arco A, Muñoz A, Sánchez-Porto A, Torres-Tortosa M, Martín-Aspas A, Arroyo A, García-Figueras C, Acosta F, Corzo JE, León-Ruiz L, Escobar-Lara T, Rodríguez-Baño J, SAEI/Bacteremia Group SAMPAC . 2012. Impact of inadequate empirical therapy on the mortality of patients with bloodstream infections: a propensity score-based analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:472–478. doi:10.1128/AAC.00462-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources