Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;44(5):762-77.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0590-2.

Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching

Affiliations

Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching

Darryl W Schneider. Mem Cognit. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Residual switch costs in cued task switching are performance decrements that occur despite a long cue-target interval (CTI) to prepare for a task switch. Verbruggen, Liefooghe, Vandierendonck, and Demanet (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33; 342-356, 2007) showed that briefly presenting the cue during the CTI and leaving it absent after target onset yielded smaller residual switch costs than those obtained when the cue was available for the full CTI and remained present after target onset. The potential effects of cue availability during the CTI (full or partial) and cue status after target onset (present or absent) on residual switch costs were investigated in the present study. In Experiments 1 and 2, cue status was manipulated while holding cue availability constant. In Experiments 3 and 4, cue status and cue availability were manipulated factorially. Residual switch costs were obtained, but they were not modulated consistently by cue status or cue availability across experiments. In Experiment 5, a direct replication of one of Verbruggen and colleagues' experiments yielded divergent results. Implications for understanding task switching are discussed.

Keywords: Cue absence; Cue availability; Residual switch cost; Task cuing; Task switching.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):234-49 - PubMed
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):832-40 - PubMed
    1. Can J Exp Psychol. 2002 Mar;56(1):18-29 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):998-1012 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1124-40 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources