Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2016 Sep;41(9):1202-8.
doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1107590. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure

Lei Xia et al. Curr Eye Res. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess and compare the dry-eye-associated parameters and corneal biomechanical status after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Methods: Sixty-five patients' (128 eyes) were collected between November 2012 and April 2013. Thirty-five (69 eyes) underwent SMILE and thirty (59 eyes) underwent FS-LASIK. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test (ST), corneal sensitivity, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were evaluated preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: There was no significant difference in visual outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK (p = 0.208). TBUT, ST, CH and CRF decreased significantly after surgery in both groups (all p < 0.05); however, the decrease of TBUT, ST and CRF in the SMILE group was not as significant as that in the FS-LASIK group (all p < 0.05) and the change of CH value was comparable in both groups (p = 0.052).Corneal sensitivity was significantly decreased in the FS-LASIK group postoperatively (p < 0.05), but not significantly changed in the SMILE group (p > 0.05). OSDI scores were significantly increased after surgery for the two groups (all p < 0.05), and the scores were much higher in the FS-LASIK group than in the SMILE group (p = 0.000).

Conclusion: The corneal biological healing of SMILE surgery was superior to FS-LASIK in the early period.

Keywords: Biological healing; FS-LASIK; OSDI; SMILE; corneal biomechanical status; tear film stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources