A cost-minimization analysis of first intention laparoscopic compared to open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer
- PMID: 26835008
- PMCID: PMC4700193
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.11.005
A cost-minimization analysis of first intention laparoscopic compared to open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer
Abstract
Background: The morbidity, mortality and survival following a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer are equivalent to an open operation. However, the cost of a longer operating time and consumables may offset savings from a shorter length of stay (LOS). A cost minimization study was undertaken to compare the relative costs.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive elective right hemicolectomies for colon cancer performed over 5 years by two teams. One team performed an open operation (OG), the other intended to perform all operations laparoscopically (LG). Clinical outcomes and relative costs were evaluated. Results expressed as mean ± SEM.
Results: There were 58 patients in the open group and 56 in the first intention laparoscopic group, of which 77% were completed laparoscopically. There was no difference in age, gender or cancer stage. The complications, mortality and 5-year survival were similar. Anaesthetic (LG = 63 ± 3, OG = 62 ± 2 min) and surgical times (LG = 144 ± 8, OG = 143 ± 5 min) were similar. Consumables cost €571 more and the total theatre cost was €643 ± 256 higher in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (p = 0.01). The LOS in the laparoscopic group (4.6 ± 0.5 days) was less than in the open group (8.3 ± 1 days, p < 0.01) saving €1960 ± 636 per patient. Overall, first intention laparoscopic right hemicolectomies saved €1316 ± 733 per patient. A probability sensitivity analysis indicated a 62% probability that a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was cheaper than an open operation.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is oncologically equivalent but less costly and should be considered the procedure of choice for right-sided colon cancer unless contraindicated.
Keywords: Colon cancer; Cost minimisation; Minimally invasive surgery; Right hemicolectomy; Survival.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cost implications and oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for right hemicolectomy.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Mar;98(3):212-5. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0065. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016. PMID: 26890838 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus open reversal of a Hartmann procedure: a single-center study.World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):2145-52. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2507-1. World J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24668452
-
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic colectomy in low volume centre following effective laparoscopic training. Retrospective cohort study.Ann Ital Chir. 2023;94:56-62. Ann Ital Chir. 2023. PMID: 36718571
-
Cost-efficiency of laparoscopic versus open colon surgery in a tertiary care center.Surg Endosc. 2011 Nov;25(11):3597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1765-3. Epub 2011 Jun 8. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21656072
-
Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: an oncologic feasible option.Surg Oncol. 2000 Nov;9(3):127-34. doi: 10.1016/s0960-7404(01)00002-0. Surg Oncol. 2000. PMID: 11356341 Review.
Cited by
-
Propensity score matching comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a middle-income country: short-term outcomes and cost analysis.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Sep 12;10:521-527. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S173718. eCollection 2018. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018. PMID: 30254479 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cancer research UK. UK bowel cancer Statistics. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st.... Accessed 1st July 2015.
-
- Ding J., Liao G.Q., Xia Y., Zhang Z.M., Liu S., Yan Z.S. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a Meta analysis. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 2013;23(1):8–16. - PubMed
-
- Rondelli F., Trastulli S., Avenia N., Schillaci G., Cirochchi R., Gulia N., Mariani E., Bistoni G., Noya G. 2013. Is Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy More Effective than Open Resection? A Meta Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j Accessed 20 September 2013. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Green B.L., Marshall H.C., Collinson F., Quirke P., Guillou P., Jayne D.G., Brown J.M. Long-term follow up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2013;100:75–82. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous