Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;4(3):177-83.
doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.4.3.177. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

Long-term Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Different Types of Structural Heart Disease

Affiliations

Long-term Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Different Types of Structural Heart Disease

Jackson J Liang et al. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) often occurs in the setting of structural heart disease and can affect patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic cardiomyopathies. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) provide mortality benefit and are therefore indicated for secondary prevention in patients with sustained VT, but they do not reduce arrhythmia burden. ICD shocks are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and antiarrhythmic medications are often used to prevent recurrent episodes. Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for patients with VT in the setting of structural heart disease and, when successful, can reduce the number of ICD shocks. However, whether VT ablation results in a mortality benefit remains unclear. We aim to review the long-term outcomes in patients with different types of structural heart disease treated with VT ablation.

Keywords: Ventricular tachycardia; cardiomyopathy; catheter ablation; outcomes; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mallidi J, Nadkarni GN, Berger RD et al. Meta-analysis of catheter ablation as an adjunct to medical therapy for treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:503–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frankel DS, Mountantonakis SE, Robinson MR et al. Ventricular tachycardia ablation remains treatment of last resort in structural heart disease: argument for earlier intervention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:1123–8. - PubMed
    1. Dinov B, Arya A, Bertagnolli L et al. Early referral for ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia is associated with improved acute and long-term outcomes: results from the Heart Center of Leipzig ventricular tachycardia registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1144–51. - PubMed
    1. Aliot EM, Stevenson WG, Almendral-Garrote JM et al. EHRA/ HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:886–933. - PubMed
    1. Arenal A, Glez-Torrecilla E, Ortiz M et al. Ablation of electrograms with an isolated, delayed component as treatment of unmappable monomorphic ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:81–92. - PubMed