A time-series study of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: premature adoption?
- PMID: 26835140
- PMCID: PMC4716454
- DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000313
A time-series study of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: premature adoption?
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance in January 2005 and subsequent trial evidence on the adoption of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PCPFO).
Methods: A retrospective time series study was conducted using the Inpatient Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) England. A total of 3801 patients, aged ≥18 and ≤60 years, who had PCPFO from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2012 in England. Percentage change annualised (PCA) in PCPFO procedure rates between initial NICE guidance and publication of trial results was analysed.
Results: Between Quarter 2, 2006 and Quarter 4, 2009, 2163 PCPFO procedures were performed, with an increasing PCA of 48.4%. The procedure rate peaked before the presentation of equivocal results from the first randomised controlled trial (RCT) in late 2010, and declined between Quarter 4, 2009 and Quarter 4, 2011 (PCA=-15.3%). Of more than 2300 patients recruited to three RCTs, only 71 were recruited in English hospitals.
Conclusions: PCPFO was rapidly adopted after the publication of initial NICE guidance despite the absence of RCT evidence of efficacy. Very few English patients participated in international RCTs of PCPFO, suggesting that NICE recommendations also failed to encourage the generation of RCT evidence.
Keywords: CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Percutaneous occlusion of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism.Rev Port Cardiol. 2001 Jul-Aug;20(7-8):747-57; discussion 759-62. Rev Port Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11582625 English, Portuguese.
-
Influence of hospital volume on outcomes of percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale closure: a 10-years US perspective.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;85(6):1073-81. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25794. Epub 2015 Feb 3. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25534392
-
Multidisciplinary Assessment in Optimising Results of Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure.Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Mar;26(3):246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.1211. Epub 2016 Aug 5. Heart Lung Circ. 2017. PMID: 27555053
-
Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale versus Medical Therapy after Cryptogenic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(3-4):162-169. doi: 10.1159/000487959. Epub 2018 Mar 29. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018. PMID: 29597192
-
Impact of Percutaneous Closure of Interatrial Shunts on Migraine Attacks: Single-Operator Series and Review of the Literature.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017;12(2):129-138. doi: 10.2174/1574887112666170328124939. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017. PMID: 28356032 Review.
Cited by
-
Large regional variation in cardiac closure procedures to prevent ischemic stroke in Switzerland a population-based small area analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0291299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291299. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38166018 Free PMC article.
-
An assessment of annual procedure volumes and therapy adoption of transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in four European countries.Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):72-80. doi: 10.1177/2396987320939804. Epub 2020 Sep 24. Eur Stroke J. 2021. PMID: 33817337 Free PMC article.
-
Device closure for patent foramen ovale following cryptogenic stroke: a survey of current practice in the UK.Open Heart. 2017 Oct 15;4(2):e000636. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000636. eCollection 2017. Open Heart. 2017. PMID: 29081978 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for the prevention of cerebral embolic stroke. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2005. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg109 (accessed 27 Jan 2015).
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous