Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;4(2):125-38.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2015.04.04.

Somatic DNA mutation analysis in targeted therapy of solid tumours

Affiliations
Review

Somatic DNA mutation analysis in targeted therapy of solid tumours

Bing Yu et al. Transl Pediatr. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Cancer is a disease of the genome with diverse aetiologies including the accumulation of acquired mutations throughout the genome. There has been a flood of knowledge improving our understanding of the biology and molecular genetics of melanoma, lung and colorectal cancer since the genomics era started. Translation of this knowledge into a better understanding of cell proliferation, survival and apoptosis has produced a paradigm shift in medical oncology enabling gene-based cancer treatment (called personalised or precision medicine). Somatic mutation analysis is crucial for a genomics approach since it can identify driver mutations-the "Achilles' heel" of cancer, and support clinical decision-making through targeted therapy. Nevertheless, the applications of somatic DNA testing in cancer face many challenges such as obtaining comprehensive coverage of the cancer genome with limited DNA being available, and delivering an accurate report in a timely fashion without false-negative and false-positive results. Further advances in DNA technologies and bioinformatics will overcome these issues and maximise opportunities for targeted therapy. Somatic mutation analysis will then become an integral part of cancer management for all malignancies.

Keywords: DNA testing; Somatic mutation; cancer genome; clinical implication; multigene analysis; solid tumours; targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: BY and RJT declare no conflict of interest. SOT has received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer and Astra Zeneca.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Canonical RAS cascades and point-of action of targeted therapies. Membrane-bound tyrosine kinase receptor: e.g., EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) and KIT (tyrosine-protein kinase Kit or CD117). Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway: RAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinases. Phophoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway: PDK, phophosinositide-dependent kinase; AKT, activate protein kinase B. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI): EGFR inhibitors include gefitinib and erlotinib as the first-generation (reversible anilinoquinazoine and ATP-mimetic), afatinib as the second-generation and AZD9291 and CO-1686 (covalent pyrimidine inhibitors) as the third-generation. KIT inhibitor is imatinib (2-phenyl-amino-pyrimidine derivative). BRAF inhibitor: sorafenib as a pan-kinase inhibitor, vemurafenib, dabrafenib and LGX818 as the selective inhibitor. MEK inhibitor: MEK162, selumetinib and trametinib as the second- and third-generations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stewart B, Wild CP. International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO. (2014) World Cancer Report 2014. Available online: http://www.thehealthwell.info/node/725845 (Accessed on 8th April 2015).
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69-90. - PubMed
    1. Masters GA, Krilov L, Bailey HH, et al. Clinical cancer advances 2015: annual report on progress against cancer from the american society of clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:786-809. - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975-2011. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2013.
    1. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:6199-206. - PMC - PubMed