Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 2:16:110.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2794-6.

Estimating the magnitude of female genital mutilation/cutting in Norway: an extrapolation model

Mai M Ziyada  1 , Marthe Norberg-Schulz  2 , R Elise B Johansen  3
Affiliations

Estimating the magnitude of female genital mutilation/cutting in Norway: an extrapolation model

Mai M Ziyada et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: With emphasis on policy implications, the main objective of this study was to estimate the numbers of two main groups affected by FGM/C in Norway: 1) those already subjected to FGM/C and therefore potentially in need for health care and 2) those at risk of FGM/C and consequently the target of preventive and protective measures. Special attention has been paid to type III as it is associated with more severe complications.

Methods: Register data from Statistics Norway (SSB) was combined with population-based survey data on FGM/C in the women/girls' countries of origin.

Results: As of January 1(st) 2013, there were 44,467 first and second-generation female immigrants residing in Norway whose country of origin is one of the 29 countries where FGM/C is well documented. About 40 pct. of these women and girls are estimated to have already been subjected to FGM/C prior to immigration to Norway. Type III is estimated in around 50 pct. of those already subjected to FGM/C. Further, a total of 15,500 girls are identified as potentially at risk, out of which an approximate number of girls ranging between 3000 and 7900 are estimated to be at risk of FGM/C.

Conclusion: Reliable estimates on FGM/C are important for evidence-based policies. The study findings indicate that about 17,300 women and girls in Norway can be in need of health care, in particular the 9100 who are estimated to have type III. Preventive and protective measures are also needed to protect girls at risk (3000 to 7900) from being subjected to FGM/C. Nevertheless, as there are no appropriate tools at the moment that can single these girls out of all who are potentially at risk, all girls in the potentially at risk group (15,500) should be targeted with preventive measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
FGM/C Percentage of girls and women already subjected to FGM/C in Norway by country of origin
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Numbers of girls and women subjected to FGM/C type III by most represented countries of origin
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation . An Interagency Statement. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Cook RJ, Dickens BM, Fathalla MF. Female genital cutting (mutilation/circumcision): ethical and legal dimensions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(3):281–287. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00277-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahman A, Toubia N. Female genital mutilation: A practical guide to worldwide laws & policies: Zed Books; London. 2000.
    1. Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist GE. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11):e006316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg RC, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Underland V, Vist G. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the obstetric consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:542859. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources