Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;41(4):583-591.
doi: 10.1177/0148607115625621. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

Long-Term Body Composition Changes in Women Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery

Affiliations

Long-Term Body Composition Changes in Women Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery

Abigail J Cole et al. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 May.

Abstract

Background: Although most individuals experience successful weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), weight regain is a concern, the composition of which is not well documented. Our aim was to evaluate changes in body composition and handgrip strength as a measure of functional status in participants from a previous 1-year post-RYGB longitudinal study who had undergone RYGB approximately 9 years prior.

Methods: Five women from an original larger cohort were monitored pre-RYGB and 1.5 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 9 years post-RYGB. Body composition was assessed at all time points using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and multiple dilution. Handgrip strength was measured using a digital isokinetic hand dynamometer (Takei Scientific Instruments, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).

Results: Mean time to final follow-up was 8.7 years. Lean soft tissue (LST) loss over the ~9-year period was on average 11.9 ± 5.6 kg. Compared with 1-year post-RYGB, 9-year LST was 4.4 ± 3.0 kg lower ( P = .03). Fat-free mass decreased over the 9-year period by 12.6 ± 5.8 kg. Mean fat mass (FM) decreased from 75.4 ± 22.6 kg pre-RYGB to 35.5 ± 21.5 kg 1 year post-RYGB but then trended toward an increase of 8.6 ± 7.0 kg between 1 year and 9 years post-RYGB ( P = .053). Loss of LST was correlated with loss of handgrip strength ( r = 0.64, P = .0005).

Conclusion: The continued loss of lean mass associated with decreased handgrip strength occurring with long-term trend toward FM regain post-RYGB is concerning. The loss of LST and functional strength carries particular implications for the aging bariatric population and should be investigated further.

Keywords: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; bariatric; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; fat-free mass; handgrip strength; lean body mass; lean tissue; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Changes in DXA measured tissue compartments after RYGB by individual including (A) lean soft tissue, (B) fat free mass, (C) total bone mass, and (D) DXA fat mass. Abbreviations: RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; mo, month; LST, lean soft tissue; FFM, fat free mass; FM, fat mass; BMC, bone mineral content. Time points are baseline (pre-RYGB) and 1.5-months, 6-months, 1-year, and 9-years after RYGB surgery. See Table 1 for mean values and significance.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Changes in handgrip strength after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery are correlated with changes in lean soft tissue measured by DXA. (A) Changes in handgrip force over time by individual, (B) correlation between lean soft tissue and handgrip force, (C) handgrip force by age compared to manufacturer normal values by age. Abbreviations: DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; mo, month. Time points are baseline (pre-RYGB) and 1.5-months, 6-months, 1-year, and 9-years after RYGB surgery. Normal handgrip strength values derived from handgrip device manufacturer (Model T.K.K., Grip D, Takei Scientific Instruments, Ltd. Japan).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison between methods for assessment of (A) fat mass, and (B) fat free mass 9-years post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. Abbreviations: 4-comp, 4-component model calculated from density by air displacement plethysmography (ADP) using the BOD POD instrument, total body water (TBW) by deuterium dilution, and total bon mineral content (BMC) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using the following equation: Fat Mass, kg = 2.747 × (body volume, l) – 0.7145 × (TBW, l) + 1.4599 (BMC, kg) – 2.0503 × (body weight, kg).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blachar A, Federle MP, Pealer KM, Ikramuddin S, Schauer PR. Gastrointestinal Complications of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery: Clinical and Imaging Findings. Radiology. 2002;223(3):625–632. - PubMed
    1. Elliot K. Nutritional considerations after bariatric surgery. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2003;26(2):133–138. - PubMed
    1. Pugnale N, Giusti V, Suter M, et al. Bone metabolism and risk of secondary hyperparathyroidism 12 months after gastric banding in obese pre-menopausal women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(1):110–116. - PubMed
    1. Faintuch J, Matsuda M, Cruz M, et al. Severe protein-calorie malnutrition after bariatric procedures. Obes Surg. 2004;14(2):175–181. - PubMed
    1. Carey DG, Pliego GJ, Raymond RL. Body composition and metabolic changes following bariatric surgery: effects on fat mass, lean mass and basal metabolic rate: six months to one-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2006;16(12):1602–1608. - PubMed

Publication types