In vitro evaluation of the risk of inflammatory response after chitosan/HA and chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/HA bone scaffold implantation
- PMID: 26838861
- DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.066
In vitro evaluation of the risk of inflammatory response after chitosan/HA and chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/HA bone scaffold implantation
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate in vitro the risk of inflammatory response induced by chitosan/hydroxyapatite (chit/HA) and novel chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/hydroxyapatite (chit/glu/HA) bone scaffolds. The inflammatory response was assessed via measurement of proinflammatory cytokine and ROI production by human monocytes, macrophages, and osteoblasts stimulated with investigated scaffolds. Moreover, adsorption of human serum/plasma proteins to the tested materials was determined. Both biomaterials did not induce intracellular ROI generation by monocytes, macrophages, and osteoblasts and did not stimulate proinflammatory cytokine (IL-6 and TNF-α) production by inflammatory cells. Moreover, the chit/glu/HA material induced increased TNF-α production by osteoblasts that is believed to enhance osteogenic differentiation. Thus, it was demonstrated that chit/HA and chit/glu/HA scaffolds carry a low risk of biomaterial-induced inflammatory response and are promising materials as bone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.
Keywords: Biomaterial-induced inflammation; Bone tissue engineering; Fibrinogen; Protein adsorption; Reactive oxygen intermediates; Tumour necrosis factor-alpha.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/hydroxyapatite bone scaffold enhances osteogenic differentiation through TNF-α-mediated mechanism.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Apr 1;73:225-233. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.081. Epub 2016 Dec 18. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017. PMID: 28183603
-
Hybrid chitosan/β-1,3-glucan matrix of bone scaffold enhances osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation via promotion of serum protein adsorption.Biomed Mater. 2016 Jul 7;11(4):045001. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/4/045001. Biomed Mater. 2016. PMID: 27388048
-
Biomedical potential of chitosan/HA and chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/HA biomaterials as scaffolds for bone regeneration--A comparative study.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Jan 1;58:891-9. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.046. Epub 2015 Sep 12. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016. PMID: 26478384
-
Evaluation of the potential of chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/hydroxyapatite material as a scaffold for living bone graft production in vitro by comparison of ADSC and BMDSC behaviour on its surface.Biomed Mater. 2017 Feb 24;12(1):015030. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa56f9. Biomed Mater. 2017. PMID: 28054934
-
Chitosan -- a promising biomaterial in veterinary medicine.Pol J Vet Sci. 2013;16(4):843-8. doi: 10.2478/pjvs-2013-0119. Pol J Vet Sci. 2013. PMID: 24597325 Review.
Cited by
-
Fabrication and in vitro biological properties of piezoelectric bioceramics for bone regeneration.Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 27;7:43360. doi: 10.1038/srep43360. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28240268 Free PMC article.
-
The Chitosan/Agarose/NanoHA Bone Scaffold-Induced M2 Macrophage Polarization and Its Effect on Osteogenic Differentiation In Vitro.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 23;22(3):1109. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031109. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33498630 Free PMC article.
-
Journey into Bone Models: A Review.Genes (Basel). 2018 May 10;9(5):247. doi: 10.3390/genes9050247. Genes (Basel). 2018. PMID: 29748516 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chitosan-collagen-hydroxyapatite membranes for tissue engineering.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022 Jan 24;33(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s10856-022-06643-w. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2022. PMID: 35072812 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial and Osteogenic Effects of Collagen Membrane Decorated with Chitosan-Nano-Hydroxyapatite.Biomolecules. 2023 Mar 23;13(4):579. doi: 10.3390/biom13040579. Biomolecules. 2023. PMID: 37189328 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources