Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 25;79(9):135.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe799135.

Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process

Robin L Corelli  1 , Michael A Muchnik  2 , Ryan J Beechinor  1 , Gary Fong  1 , Eleanor M Vogt  1 , Jennifer M Cocohoba  1 , Candy Tsourounis  1 , Karen Suchanek Hudmon  3
Affiliations

Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process

Robin L Corelli et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To improve the quality of admissions interviews for a doctor of pharmacy program, using a multiple mini-interview (MMI) in place of the standard interview.

Methods: Stakeholders completed an anonymous web-based survey. This study characterized perceptions of the MMI format across 3 major stakeholders (candidates, interviewers, admissions committee members) and included comparative cost estimates.Costs were estimated using human and facility resources from the 2012 cycle (standard format) and the 2013 cycle (MMI format).

Results: Most candidates (65%), interviewers (86%), and admissions committee members (79%) perceived the MMI format as effective for evaluating applicants, and most (59% of candidates, 84% of interviewers, 77% of committee members) agreed that the MMI format should be continued. Cost per candidate interviewed was $136.34 (standard interview) vs $75.30 (MMI).

Conclusion: Perceptions of the MMI process were favorable across stakeholder groups, and this format was less costly per candidate interviewed.

Keywords: admission interview; multiple mini interviews; pharmacy students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Stakeholder Perceptions Regarding Continued Use of the MMI.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abraham JM. How might the Affordable Care Act’s coverage expansion provisions influence demand for medical care? Milbank Q. 2014;92:63–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith M, Bates DW, Bodenheimer TS. Pharmacists belong in accountable care organizations and integrated care teams. Health Affairs. 2013;32(11):1963–1970. - PubMed
    1. Latif DA. Including the assessment of nontraditional factors in pharmacy school admissions. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(4):721–726. - PubMed
    1. Cain J, Romanelli F, Smith KM. Academic entitlement in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(10) Article 189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron AJ, Mackeigan LD. Development and pilot testing of a multiple mini-interview for admission to a pharmacy degree program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(1) Article 10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources