Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;20(4):e18996.
doi: 10.5812/traumamon.18996. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

Assessment of Electrosurgery Burns in Cardiac Surgery

Affiliations

Assessment of Electrosurgery Burns in Cardiac Surgery

Seyyed Mehdi Jalali et al. Trauma Mon. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Monopolar surgery is applied mostly in major operations, while bipolar is used in delicate ones. Attention must be paid in electrosurgery application to avoid electrical burns.

Objectives: We aimed to assess factors associated with electrosurgery burns in cardiac surgery operating rooms.

Patients and methods: This was a case-control study in which two groups of 150 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Imam Khomeini Hospital were recruited. Several factors like gender, age, operation duration, smoking, diseases, infection, atopia, , immunosuppressive drugs use, hepatic cirrhosis, and pulmonary diseases were compared between the two groups. Patients were observed for 24 hours for development of any burn related to the operation. Data was analyzed using SPSS v.11.5, by Chi square and T-test.

Results: Patients in the two groups were similar except for two factors. DM and pulmonary diseases which showed significant differences (P = 0.005 and P = 0.002 respectively). Seventy-five patients from controls and 35 from the study group developed burns, which was significant (P ˂ 0.0001).

Conclusions: None of the factors were significantly related to developing burns. The differences between the two groups highlights the importance of systems modifications to lessen the incidence of burns.

Keywords: Burn; Electrocautery; Electrosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Odell RC. Surgical complications specific to monopolar electrosurgical energy: engineering changes that have made electrosurgery safer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(3):288–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galloro G, Magno L, Ruggiero S, Iovino P, Formisano C, Cortese L, et al. Comparison between tungsten and steel polypectomy snares: evaluation of depth of colonic thermal wall injury in a pig model. Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):121–6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325930. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saaiq M, Zaib S, Ahmad S. Electrocautery burns: experience with three cases and review of literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2012;25(4):203–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tucker RD, Voyles CR. Laparoscopic electrosurgical complications and their prevention. AORN J. 1995;62(1):51–3. - PubMed
    1. Vsatin R. Skin Surger: a practical guide. st. lovis: Mosby; 1998.

LinkOut - more resources