Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 1039 U.S. Physicians Reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank for Sexual Misconduct, 2003-2013
- PMID: 26840639
- PMCID: PMC4739584
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147800
Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 1039 U.S. Physicians Reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank for Sexual Misconduct, 2003-2013
Abstract
Background: Little information exists on U.S. physicians who have been disciplined with licensure or restriction-of-clinical-privileges actions or have had malpractice payments because of sexual misconduct. Our objectives were to: (1) determine the number of these physicians and compare their age groups' distribution with that of the general U.S. physician population; (2) compare the type of disciplinary actions taken against these physicians with actions taken against physicians disciplined for other offenses; (3) compare the characteristics and type of injury among victims of these physicians with those of victims in reports for physicians with other offenses in malpractice-payment reports; and (4) determine the percentages of physicians with clinical-privileges or malpractice-payment reports due to sexual misconduct who were not disciplined by medical boards.
Methods and results: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of physician reports submitted to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) from January 1, 2003, through September 30, 2013. A total of 1039 physicians had ≥ 1 sexual-misconduct-related reports. The majority (75.6%) had only licensure reports, and 90.1% were 40 or older. For victims in malpractice-payment reports, 87.4% were female, and "emotional injury only" was the predominant type of injury. We found a higher percentage of serious licensure actions and clinical-privileges revocations in sexual-misconduct-related reports than in reports for other offenses (89.0% vs 68.1%, P = < .001, and 29.3% vs 18.8%, P = .002, respectively). Seventy percent of the physicians with a clinical-privileges or malpractice-payment report due to sexual misconduct were not disciplined by medical boards for this problem.
Conclusions: A small number of physicians were reported to the NPDB because of sexual misconduct. It is concerning that a majority of the physicians with a clinical-privileges action or malpractice-payment report due to sexual misconduct were not disciplined by medical boards for this unethical behavior.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Crossing the line: Sexual misconduct by nurses reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank.Public Health Nurs. 2019 Mar;36(2):109-117. doi: 10.1111/phn.12567. Epub 2018 Dec 17. Public Health Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30556923 Free PMC article.
-
The National Practitioner Data Bank: information for and about midwifery.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Nov-Dec;50(6):525-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.08.008. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005. PMID: 16260367
-
Time to End Physician Sexual Abuse of Patients: Calling the U.S. Medical Community to Action.J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1330-1333. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05014-6. Epub 2019 May 1. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31044409 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Doctors disciplined for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2009.Med J Aust. 2011 May 2;194(9):452-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03058.x. Med J Aust. 2011. PMID: 21534900
-
The National Practitioner Data Bank: issues in plastic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):2252-2257. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f4459b. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20697316 Review.
Cited by
-
Sexual Violation of Patients by Physicians: A Mixed-Methods, Exploratory Analysis of 101 Cases.Sex Abuse. 2019 Aug;31(5):503-523. doi: 10.1177/1079063217712217. Epub 2017 Jun 19. Sex Abuse. 2019. PMID: 28627296 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of the factors and the key indicators that identify doctors at risk of complaints, malpractice claims or impaired performance.BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 24;11(8):e050377. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050377. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34429317 Free PMC article.
-
Extreme medical misconduct: 49 UK-registered doctors involved in child pornography, dealt with by the General Medical Council 2012-2020.Med Leg J. 2023 Sep;91(3):148-152. doi: 10.1177/00258172231159765. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Med Leg J. 2023. PMID: 36988229 Free PMC article.
-
A focused mapping review and synthesis of a priori risk factors associated with medical misconduct.BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 29;8(2):e000538. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000538. eCollection 2019. BMJ Open Qual. 2019. PMID: 31321315 Free PMC article.
-
Responding to Sexual Abuse in Health Care: Development of a Guide for Patients.J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022 Apr 18;9(2):117-121. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1881. eCollection 2022 Spring. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022. PMID: 35600235 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc (2006) Addressing Sexual Boundaries: Guidelines for State Medical Boards. Available: http://library.fsmb.org/pdf/grpol_sexualboundaries.pdf. Accessed 2014 Aug 2.
-
- Edelstein L (1989) The Hippocratic Oath: text, translation and interpretation In: Veatch R, editor. Cross cultural perspectives in medical ethics: Readings. Boston: Jones and Bartlett; pp. 6–24.
-
- Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association (1991) Sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine. JAMA 266:2741–45. - PubMed
-
- Eichenberg C (2010) Sexual assaults in therapeutic relationships: prevalence, risk factors and consequences. Health 2:1018–26.
-
- Disch E (2006) Sexual victimization and revictimization of women by professionals: client experiences and implications for subsequent treatment. Women Ther 29:41–61.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources