Serum Calprotectin Versus Acute-Phase Reactants in the Discrimination of Inflammatory Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
- PMID: 26841119
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.22795
Serum Calprotectin Versus Acute-Phase Reactants in the Discrimination of Inflammatory Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
Erratum in
-
Incorrect Value in Table 2 in the Article by Inciarte-Mundo et al (Arthritis Care Res [Hoboken], July 2016).Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jan;69(1):155. doi: 10.1002/acr.23169. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017. PMID: 28026158 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the accuracy of serum calprotectin and acute-phase reactants (C-reactive protein [CRP] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) in stratifying disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), and to correlate calprotectin levels with TNFi trough serum levels.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 87 RA patients receiving adalimumab, etanercept (ETN), or infliximab (IFX); 56 psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients and 40 healthy blood donors were included as controls. Associations between calprotectin, CRP, and ESR and composite articular indices (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28], Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI], and Clinical Disease Activity Index) were analyzed by correlation and linear regression and the accuracy and discriminatory capacity of calprotectin by receiver operator characteristic curves (area under the curve [AUC]).
Results: Calprotectin levels correlated better with all composite activity indices than CRP and ESR (all r coefficients >0.70). Calprotectin levels were significantly lower in RA and PsA patients in clinical remission compared with those with low disease activity for all articular indices. In RA, ESR discriminated between remission and low disease activity only when using DAS28, and CRP only with SDAI. In RA patients in remission/low disease activity, calprotectin but not CRP or ESR distinguished between patients with no swollen joints and those with ≥1 swollen joint (1.74 μg/ml versus 3.04 μg/ml; P = 0.010). Using DAS28 ≥2.6 as the reference variable, calprotectin showed an AUC of 0.92; the best cutoff was ≥2.47 μg/ml with a likelihood ratio of 6.3 (95% confidence interval 2.5-15.8). Calprotectin serum levels inversely correlated with trough serum drug levels of ETN (ρ = -0.671, P < 0.001) and IFX (ρ = -0.729, P = 0.017).
Conclusion: Calprotectin may more accurately discriminate disease activity in RA patients receiving TNFi than acute-phase reactants, even in patients with low inflammatory activity.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.
Comment in
-
Equivalent Units of Serum C-Reactive Protein and Calprotectin are Compared in a Recent RA Study: Comment on the Article by Inciarte-Mundo et al.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;69(4):605-606. doi: 10.1002/acr.23126. Epub 2017 Mar 3. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017. PMID: 27748059 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;69(4):606-607. doi: 10.1002/acr.23125. Epub 2017 Mar 3. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017. PMID: 27748077 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
