Repeatability of Brain Volume Measurements Made with the Atlas-based Method from T1-weighted Images Acquired Using a 0.4 Tesla Low Field MR Scanner
- PMID: 26841856
- PMCID: PMC5608110
- DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0107
Repeatability of Brain Volume Measurements Made with the Atlas-based Method from T1-weighted Images Acquired Using a 0.4 Tesla Low Field MR Scanner
Abstract
Purpose: An understanding of the repeatability of measured results is important for both the atlas-based and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) methods of magnetic resonance (MR) brain volumetry. However, many recent studies that have investigated the repeatability of brain volume measurements have been performed using static magnetic fields of 1-4 tesla, and no study has used a low-strength static magnetic field. The aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability of measured volumes using the atlas-based method and a low-strength static magnetic field (0.4 tesla).
Materials and methods: Ten healthy volunteers participated in this study. Using a 0.4 tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and a quadrature head coil, three-dimensional T1-weighted images (3D-T1WIs) were obtained from each subject, twice on the same day. VBM8 software was used to construct segmented normalized images [gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) images]. The regions-of-interest (ROIs) of GM, WM, CSF, hippocampus (HC), orbital gyrus (OG), and cerebellum posterior lobe (CPL) were generated using WFU PickAtlas. The percentage change was defined as[100 × (measured volume with first segmented image - mean volume in each subject)/(mean volume in each subject)]The average percentage change was calculated as the percentage change in the 6 ROIs of the 10 subjects.
Results: The mean of the average percentage changes for each ROI was as follows: GM, 0.556%; WM, 0.324%; CSF, 0.573%; HC, 0.645%; OG, 1.74%; and CPL, 0.471%. The average percentage change was higher for the orbital gyrus than for the other ROIs.
Conclusion: We consider that repeatability of the atlas-based method is similar between 0.4 and 1.5 tesla MR scanners. To our knowledge, this is the first report to show that the level of repeatability with a 0.4 tesla MR scanner is adequate for the estimation of brain volume change by the atlas-based method.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Repeatability of measured brain volume by atlas-based method using T1-weighted image.J Digit Imaging. 2012 Feb;25(1):173-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-011-9412-z. J Digit Imaging. 2012. PMID: 21773867 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of parameter settings in voxel-based morphometry 8. Using DARTEL and region-of-interest on reproducibility in gray matter volumetry.Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(2):171-8. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0049. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Methods Inf Med. 2015. PMID: 25345402
-
Intra- and interscanner variability of magnetic resonance imaging based volumetry in multiple sclerosis.Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Jul 16. Neuroimage. 2016. PMID: 27431758
-
Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra provides reduced effect of scanner for cortex volumetry with atlas-based method in healthy subjects.Neuroradiology. 2013 Jul;55(7):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1193-2. Epub 2013 Apr 26. Neuroradiology. 2013. PMID: 23619702
-
Ten simple rules for reporting voxel-based morphometry studies.Neuroimage. 2008 May 1;40(4):1429-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Jan 17. Neuroimage. 2008. PMID: 18314353 Review.
Cited by
-
Advantages of Using Both Voxel- and Surface-based Morphometry in Cortical Morphology Analysis: A Review of Various Applications.Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Mar 1;21(1):41-57. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0096. Epub 2022 Feb 18. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35185061 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mis-segmentation in voxel-based morphometry due to a signal intensity change in the putamen.Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Dec;10(4):515-524. doi: 10.1007/s12194-017-0424-3. Epub 2017 Oct 3. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017. PMID: 28975537
-
Accuracy of skull stripping in a single-contrast convolutional neural network model using eight-contrast magnetic resonance images.Radiol Phys Technol. 2023 Sep;16(3):373-383. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00728-z. Epub 2023 Jun 8. Radiol Phys Technol. 2023. PMID: 37291372
-
Comparison of Brain Volume Measurements Made with 0.3- and 3-T MR Imaging.Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Jul 1;21(3):517-524. doi: 10.2463/mrms.tn.2020-0034. Epub 2021 Jul 22. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 34305081 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of changing the analyzed image contrast on the accuracy of intracranial volume extraction using Brain Extraction Tool 2.Radiol Phys Technol. 2020 Mar;13(1):76-82. doi: 10.1007/s12194-019-00551-5. Epub 2020 Jan 2. Radiol Phys Technol. 2020. PMID: 31898013
References
-
- Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. Neuroimage 2000; 11 ( 6 Pt 1): 805– 821. - PubMed
-
- Courchesne E, Chisum HJ, Townsend J, et al. Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology 2000; 216: 672– 682. - PubMed
-
- Pfefferbaum A, Mathalon DH, Sullivan EV, Rawles JM, Zipursky RB, Lim KO. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from infancy to late adulthood. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 874– 887. - PubMed
-
- Luft AR, Skalej M, Schulz JB, et al. Patterns of age-related shrinkage in cerebellum and brainstem observed in vivo using three-dimensional MRI volumetry. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9: 712– 721. - PubMed
-
- Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1233– 1239. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous