Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;22(4):298-305.
doi: 10.1111/cns.12498. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Expression Profile of Long Noncoding RNAs in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Affiliations

Expression Profile of Long Noncoding RNAs in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Fang Zhang et al. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a key role in regulating immunological functions. Their impact on the chronic inflammatory disease multiple sclerosis (MS), however, remains unknown. We investigated the expression of lncRNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with MS and attempt to explain their possible role in the process of MS.

Methods: For this study, we recruited 26 patients with MS according to the revised McDonald criteria. Then, we randomly chose 6 patients for microarray analysis. Microarray assays identified outstanding differences in lncRNA expression, which were verified through real-time PCR. LncRNA functions were annotated for target genes using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses, and regulatory relationships between lncRNAs and target genes were analyzed using the "cis" and "trans" model.

Results: There were 2353 upregulated lncRNAs, 389 downregulated lncRNAs, 1037 upregulated mRNAs, and 279 downregulated mRNAs in patients with MS compared to healthy control subjects (fold change >2.0). Real-time PCR results of six aberrant lncRNAs were consistent with the microarray data. The coexpression network comprised 864 lncRNAs and 628 mRNAs. Among differentially expressed lncRNAs, 10 lncRNAs were predicted to have 10 cis-regulated target genes, and 33 lncRNAs might regulate their trans target genes.

Conclusions: We identified a subset of dysregulated lncRNAs and mRNAs. The differentially expressed lncRNAs may be important in the process of MS. However, the specific molecular mechanisms and biological functions of these lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of MS need further study.

Keywords: Long noncoding RNAs; Microarray; Multiple sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
LncRNA and mRNA profiles of microarray data. (A, D). Log–log scatter plots of lncRNA and mRNA expression. The red and green points in the plot indicate more than 2‐fold change of lncRNAs and mRNAs between multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy control samples. (B, E). Volcano plots of the differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs. The red and green points in the plot represent the differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNA having statistical significance. (C, F). Hierarchical clustering shows a distinguishable lncRNA and mRNA expression profile between the two groups. Plots here represent analysis of RNA extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from 6 patients with MS and 5 healthy control subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of lncRNA expression levels as determined by microarray and real‐time PCR analyses. Three upregulated and three downregulated differentially expressed lncRNAs were validated by real‐time PCR of RNA extracted from PBMCs from 20 patients with MS and 20 healthy control subjects. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Column heights represent mean fold changes in expression of the MS group. Real‐time PCR results are consistent with microarray data. ***P < 0.001: MS group versus healthy control group in real‐time PCR validation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Top 30 gene ontology (GO) terms for the difference in lncRNA coexpressed genes between patients with MS and healthy control subjects. (B) KEGG pathways analysis. Top 30 pathways for the difference in lncRNA coexpressed genes between the patients with MS and healthy control subjects.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) “TF–lncRNA” network comparison between the patients with MS and healthy control subjects. (B) “TF–lncRNA–target gene” core network of disrupted lncRNA expression in patients with MS versus healthy control subjects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McFarland HF, Martin R. Multiple sclerosis: A complicated picture of autoimmunity. Nat Immunol 2007;8:913–919. - PubMed
    1. Sawcer S, Franklin RJ, Ban M. Multiple sclerosis genetics. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:700–709. - PubMed
    1. Ascherio A, Munger KL. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: The role of infection. Ann Neurol 2007;61:288–299. - PubMed
    1. Ascherio A, Munger KL. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part II: noninfectious factors. Ann Neurol 2007;61:504–513. - PubMed
    1. Calabrese R, Valentini E, Ciccarone F, et al. TET2 gene expression and 5‐hydroxymethylcytosine level in multiple sclerosis peripheral blood cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014;1842:1130–1136. - PubMed

Publication types