Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;22(3):368-71.
doi: 10.1177/1591019916628322. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies: A study on radiation exposure at the lens of the primary operator

Affiliations

The importance of protection glasses during neuroangiographies: A study on radiation exposure at the lens of the primary operator

J B Tavares et al. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In interventional neuroradiology, few operators routinely use radiation protection glasses. Moreover, in most centers, radiation dose data only accounts for whole body dose without specific information on lens dose. In 2012, the International Commission on Radiological Protection advised that the threshold limit value for the lens should be 20 mSv/year instead of the previous 150 mSv/year limit. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the operator's lens during real diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographies, either using or without lead protection glasses.

Methods: Using the Educational Direct Dosimeter (EDD30 dosimeter), accumulated radiation dose in the lens was measured in 13 neuroangiographies: seven diagnostic and six interventional. Operators with and without radiation protection glasses were included and the sensor was placed near their left eye, closest to the radiation beam.

Results: Without glasses, the corrected mean dose of radiation in the lens was 8.02 µSv for diagnostic procedures and 168.57 µSv for interventional procedures. Using glasses, these values were reduced to 1.74 µSv and 33.24 µSv, respectively.

Conclusion: Considering 20 mSv as the suggested annual limit of equivalent dose in the lens, neuroradiologists may perform up to 2,494 diagnostic procedures per year without protecting glasses, a number that increases to 11,494 when glasses are used consistently. Regarding intervention, a maximum of 119 procedures per year is advised if glasses are not used, whereas up to 602 procedures/year may be performed using this protection. Therefore, neuroradiologists should always wear radiation protection glasses.

Keywords: Radiation protection; lead protection glasses; lens radiation exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Layton KF, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, et al. Radiation exposure to the primary operator during endovascular surgical neuroradiology procedures. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 742–743. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bor D. Patient and staff doses in interventional neuroradiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 117: 62–68. - PubMed
    1. Little MP. Risks associated with ionizing radiation: Environmental pollution and health. Br Med Bull 2003; 68(1): 259–275. - PubMed
    1. ICRP. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 1991; 21. - PubMed
    1. Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, et al. Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat Res 2010; 174: 490–495. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources