Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;103(3):801-7.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.118679. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

Using growth velocity to predict child mortality

Affiliations

Using growth velocity to predict child mortality

Catherine Schwinger et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Growth assessment based on the WHO child growth velocity standards can potentially be used to predict adverse health outcomes. Nevertheless, there are very few studies on growth velocity to predict mortality.

Objectives: We aimed to determine the ability of various growth velocity measures to predict child death within 3 mo and to compare it with those of attained growth measures.

Design: Data from 5657 children <5 y old who were enrolled in a cohort study in the Democratic Republic of Congo were used. Children were measured up to 6 times in 3-mo intervals, and 246 (4.3%) children died during the study period. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models informed the mortality risk within 3 mo for weight and length velocity z scores and 3-mo changes in midupper arm circumference (MUAC). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to present balance in sensitivity and specificity to predict child death.

Results: GEE models showed that children had an exponential increase in the risk of dying with decreasing growth velocity in all 4 indexes (1.2- to 2.4-fold for every unit decrease). A length and weight velocity z score of <-3 was associated with an 11.8- and a 7.9-fold increase, respectively, in the RR of death in the subsequent 3-mo period (95% CIs: 3.9, 35.5, and 3.9, 16.2, respectively). Weight and length velocity z scores had better predictive abilities [area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.67 and 0.69] than did weight-for-age (AUC: 0.57) and length-for-age (AUC: 0.52) z scores. Among wasted children (weight-for-height z score <-2), the AUC of weight velocity z scores was 0.87. Absolute MUAC performed best among the attained indexes (AUC: 0.63), but longitudinal assessment of MUAC-based indexes did not increase the predictive value.

Conclusion: Although repeated growth measures are slightly more complex to implement, their superiority in mortality-predictive abilities suggests that these could be used more for identifying children at increased risk of death.

Keywords: WHO growth velocity standards; anthropometry; longitudinal growth; mortality; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study profile of the cohort study in Bwamanda, Democratic Republic of Congo: 1989–1991. LFU, lost to follow-up.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Observed and predicted (by using a GEE model) probabilities of death within 3 mo for children included in a cohort study in Bwamanda, Democratic Republic of Congo (1989–1991), for weight velocity z score (A; n = 2296), length velocity z score (B; n = 2296), change in MUAC-for-age z score (C; n = 4451), and changes in absolute MUAC (D; n = 4451). GEE, generalized estimating equation; MUAC, midupper arm circumference.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing survival for all 5657 children under the age of 5 y included in a cohort study in Bwamanda, Democratic Republic of Congo (1989–1991), at different ages (with 95% CIs).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves for ability to predict death within 3 mo in 2567 children aged 3–24 mo included in a cohort study in Bwamanda, Democratic Republic of Congo (1989–1991), by WVZ and WAZ (A), LVZ and LAZ (B), ΔMUACZ and MUACZ (C), and ΔabsMUAC and absMUAC (D). z Scores are calculated with help of the WHO Child Growth Standard. AUC values of the individual predictors are given in the inserts of each plot. absMUAC, absolute midupper arm circumference; LAZ, length-for-age z score; LVZ, length velocity z score; MUAC, midupper arm circumference; MUACZ, midupper arm circumference z score; WAZ, weight-for-age z score; WVZ, weight velocity z score; ΔabsMUAC, change in absolute values of midupper arm circumference; ΔMUACZ, change in midupper arm circumference z score.

Comment in

References

    1. de Onis M, Wijnhoven TM, Onyango AW. Worldwide practices in child growth monitoring. J Pediatr 2004;144:461–5. - PubMed
    1. Mwangome MK, Fegan G, Fulford T, Prentice AM, Berkley JA. Mid-upper arm circumference at age of routine infant vaccination to identify infants at elevated risk of death: a retrospective cohort study in the Gambia. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:887–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briend A, Maire B, Fontaine O, Garenne M. Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children. Matern Child Nutr 2012;8:130–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Neill SM, Fitzgerald A, Briend A, Van den Broeck J. Child mortality as predicted by nutritional status and recent weight velocity in children under two in rural Africa. J Nutr 2012;142:520–5. - PubMed
    1. Akinbami FO, Hamzat TH, Orimadegun AE, Tongo O, Oyeyemi L, Okafor O, Akinyinka OO. Body mass composition: a predictor of admission outcomes among hospitalized Nigerian under 5 children. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2010;19:295–300. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources