Practice variation in the structure of stroke rehabilitation in four rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands
- PMID: 26843457
- DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2054
Practice variation in the structure of stroke rehabilitation in four rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands
Abstract
Objective: To describe practice variation in the structure of stroke rehabilitation in 4 specialized multidisciplinary rehabilitation centres in the Netherlands.
Design and methods: A multidisciplinary expert group formulated a set of 23 elements concerning the structure of inpatient and outpatient stroke rehabilitation, categorized into 4 domains: admission-related (n = 7), treatment-related (n = 10), client involvement-related (n = 2), and facilities-related (n = 4). In a cross-sectional study in 4 rehabilitation centres data on the presence and content of these elements were abstracted from treatment programmes and protocols. In a structured expert meeting consensus was reached on the presence of practice variation per element.
Results: Practice variation was observed in 22 of the 23 structure elements. The element "strategies for patient involvement" appeared similar in all rehabilitation centres, whereas differences were found in the elements regarding admission, exclusion and discharge criteria, patient subgroups, care pathways, team meetings, clinical assessments, maximum time to admission, aftercare and return to work modules, health professionals, treatment facilities, and care-giver involvement.
Conclusion: Practice variation was found in a wide range of aspects of the structure of stroke rehabilitation.
Similar articles
-
Factors enhancing activities of daily living after stroke in specialized rehabilitation: an observational multicenter study within the Sunnaas International Network.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;53(5):725-734. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04489-6. Epub 2017 Apr 14. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017. PMID: 28417611
-
Stroke rehabilitation: an international perspective.Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):44-56. doi: 10.1310/tsr1601-44. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19443347 Review.
-
The effect of a structured model for stroke rehabilitation multi-disciplinary team meetings on functional recovery and productivity: a Phase I/II proof of concept study.Clin Rehabil. 2015 Sep;29(9):920-5. doi: 10.1177/0269215514562591. Epub 2014 Dec 9. Clin Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25490894 Clinical Trial.
-
Functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis admitted for multidisciplinary rehabilitation from 1992 to 2009.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Oct;52(10):1879-83. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket232. Epub 2013 Jul 16. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013. PMID: 23861533
-
Hospital-based stroke rehabilitation in the United States.Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):34-43. doi: 10.1310/tsr1601-34. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19443346 Review.
Cited by
-
Societal burden of stroke rehabilitation: Costs and health outcomes after admission to stroke rehabilitation.J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun 2;53(6):jrm00201. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2829. J Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 33856036 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of a comprehensive eRehabilitation intervention alongside conventional stroke rehabilitation on disability and health-related quality of life: A pre-post comparison.J Rehabil Med. 2021 Mar 5;53(3):jrm00161. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2785. J Rehabil Med. 2021. PMID: 33369683 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in factors influencing the use of eRehabilitation after stroke; a cross-sectional comparison between Brazilian and Dutch healthcare professionals.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05339-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32487255 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical