Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving
- PMID: 26843570
- DOI: 10.1177/0018720815625744
Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving
Abstract
Objective: The feasibility of measuring drivers' automation trust via gaze behavior during highly automated driving was assessed with eye tracking and validated with self-reported automation trust in a driving simulator study.
Background: Earlier research from other domains indicates that drivers' automation trust might be inferred from gaze behavior, such as monitoring frequency.
Method: The gaze behavior and self-reported automation trust of 35 participants attending to a visually demanding non-driving-related task (NDRT) during highly automated driving was evaluated. The relationship between dispositional, situational, and learned automation trust with gaze behavior was compared.
Results: Overall, there was a consistent relationship between drivers' automation trust and gaze behavior. Participants reporting higher automation trust tended to monitor the automation less frequently. Further analyses revealed that higher automation trust was associated with lower monitoring frequency of the automation during NDRTs, and an increase in trust over the experimental session was connected with a decrease in monitoring frequency.
Conclusion: We suggest that (a) the current results indicate a negative relationship between drivers' self-reported automation trust and monitoring frequency, (b) gaze behavior provides a more direct measure of automation trust than other behavioral measures, and (c) with further refinement, drivers' automation trust during highly automated driving might be inferred from gaze behavior.
Application: Potential applications of this research include the estimation of drivers' automation trust and reliance during highly automated driving.
Keywords: autonomous driving; eye tracking; human–automation interaction; trust in automation; vehicle design.
© 2016, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Similar articles
-
Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.Hum Factors. 2019 Aug;61(5):839-849. doi: 10.1177/0018720818814963. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Hum Factors. 2019. PMID: 30517032
-
Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan;66:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12. Appl Ergon. 2018. PMID: 28958427 Clinical Trial.
-
Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers' Takeover Performance and Automation Trust.Hum Factors. 2017 May;59(3):457-470. doi: 10.1177/0018720816678714. Epub 2016 Dec 6. Hum Factors. 2017. PMID: 27923886
-
Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107076. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107076. Epub 2023 May 5. Accid Anal Prev. 2023. PMID: 37150132
-
Assessment selection in human-automation interaction studies: The Failure-GAM2E and review of assessment methods for highly automated driving.Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan;66:182-192. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Appl Ergon. 2018. PMID: 28865841 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of an Unexpected and Expected Event on Older Adults' Autonomic Arousal and Eye Fixations During Autonomous Driving.Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:571961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571961. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33071906 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration.PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229132. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32084201 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis of Kinect-Based and Oculus-Based Gaze Region Estimation Methods in a Driving Simulator.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 23;21(1):26. doi: 10.3390/s21010026. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33374560 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting sources of anger in automated driving: driving-related and external factor.Front Neuroergon. 2025 May 9;6:1548861. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1548861. eCollection 2025. Front Neuroergon. 2025. PMID: 40417070 Free PMC article.
-
Trust Dynamics and Verbal Assurances in Human Robot Physical Collaboration.Front Artif Intell. 2021 Jul 20;4:703504. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.703504. eCollection 2021. Front Artif Intell. 2021. PMID: 34355165 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources