Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Jan-Feb;131(1):76-85.
doi: 10.1177/003335491613100114.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Inhaled Toxicants from Waterpipe and Cigarette Smoking

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Inhaled Toxicants from Waterpipe and Cigarette Smoking

Brian A Primack et al. Public Health Rep. 2016 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) is an emerging trend worldwide. To inform public health policy and educational programming, we systematically reviewed the biomedical literature to compute the inhaled smoke volume, nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide (CO) associated with a single WTS session and a single cigarette.

Methods: We searched seven biomedical bibliographic databases for controlled laboratory or natural environment studies designed to mimic human tobacco consumption. Included studies quantified the mainstream smoke of a single cigarette and/or single WTS session for smoke volume, nicotine, tar, and/or CO. We conducted meta-analyses to calculate summary estimates for the inhalation of each unique substance for each mode of tobacco consumption. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using chi-squared and I-squared statistics.

Results: Sufficient data from 17 studies were available to derive pooled estimates for inhalation of each exposure via each smoking method. Two researchers working independently abstracted measurement of smoke volume in liters, and nicotine, tar, and CO in milligrams. All numbers included in meta-analyses matched precisely between the two researchers (100% agreement, Cohen's k=1.00). Whereas one WTS session was associated with 74.1 liters of smoke inhalation (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.2, 110.0), one cigarette was associated with 0.6 liters of smoke (95% CI 0.5, 0.7). One WTS session was also associated with higher levels of nicotine, tar, and CO.

Conclusions: One WTS session consistently exposed users to larger smoke volumes and higher levels of tobacco toxicants compared with one cigarette. These computed estimates may be valuable to emphasize in prevention programming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Selection of studies in a literature review quantifying single-session waterpipe tobacco smoking and cigarette use in the United States, 2012–2015

References

    1. Maziak W. The global epidemic of waterpipe smoking. Addict Behav. 2011;36:1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO; 2005. TobReg advisory note: waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Primack BA, Shensa A, Kim KH, Carroll MV, Hoban MT, Leino EV, et al. Waterpipe smoking among U.S. university students. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15:29–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sidani JE, Shensa A, Primack BA. Substance and hookah use and living arrangement among fraternity and sorority members at US colleges and universities. J Community Health. 2013;38:238–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Primack BA, Sidani J, Agarwal AA, Shadel WG, Donny EC, Eissenberg TE. Prevalence of and associations with waterpipe tobacco smoking among U.S. university students. Ann Behav Med. 2008;36:81–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types