Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group
- PMID: 2684385
- DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891215)64:12<2465::aid-cncr2820641212>3.0.co;2-y
Has there been any improvement in the staging of gastric cancer? Findings from the German Gastric Cancer TNM Study Group
Abstract
This multicenter observational study examined the survival of 1420 patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the stomach. From April 1982 through October 1984, 1360 (95%) patients underwent surgery, 988 (72%) had resections, and 372 (28%) minor surgical procedures. The percentage of patients who have been followed until death or 3 to 5 years was 99.4%. Patients were staged preoperatively and intraoperatively and by pathologists using the old (1978) and new (1987) TNM stage groupings and 5-year survival was analyzed. Subgroups of patients who changed their stage group according to the new stage definitions were analyzed separately. Only age was an important prognostic factor for survival in Stage IA (P less than 0.05) and Stage IB (P less than 0.01). Residual tumor after surgery was most important for survival in Stage II (P less than 0.01) and Stage IIIA (P less than 0.001). This indicates that improvements of stage definitions for individual prognosis can only be achieved by adding data concerning the presence or absence of residual tumor (R classification).
Similar articles
-
[Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with advanced gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):180-184. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29492917 Chinese.
-
Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project.Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(2):217-225. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0601-9. Epub 2016 Feb 20. Gastric Cancer. 2017. PMID: 26897166 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and necessity of sub-classification of N3 in the 7th UICC TNM stage of gastric cancer.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(3):2091-5. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.3.2091. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013. PMID: 23679324
-
Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;22(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 18. Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23787074 Review.
-
Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.Am Surg. 2007 Apr;73(4):359-66. Am Surg. 2007. PMID: 17439029 Review.
Cited by
-
Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):362-71. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00008. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 10973386 Free PMC article.
-
Extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: when, for whom and why.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998 Jan;80(1):16-24. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998. PMID: 9579122 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Morphological predictors of survival in early and advanced gastric carcinoma.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1992;118(4):296-302. doi: 10.1007/BF01208619. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1577848 Free PMC article.
-
[Early stomach cancer in comparison with advanced stomach cancer. Results of a prospective study of diagnosis and 5-year survival of 131 patients with early stomach cancer and 795 patients with advanced stomach cancer].Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991;376(1):16-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00205122. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991. PMID: 2034000 German.
-
Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.Gut. 1996 Apr;38(4):525-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.38.4.525. Gut. 1996. PMID: 8707081 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous