Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
- PMID: 26843918
- PMCID: PMC4724593
- DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.95
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
Abstract
Aim: To determine the effect of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for colorectal cancer on short-term clinical and oncological outcomes by comparison with multiport conventional laparoscopic colectomy (CLC).
Methods: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE for the time period of 2008 to December 2014 to retrieve all relevant literature. The search terms were "laparoscopy", "single incision", "single port", "single site", "SILS", "LESS" and "colorectal cancer". Publications were included if they were randomized controlled trials, case-matched controlled studies, or comparative studies, in which patients underwent single-incision (SILS or LESS) laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Studies were excluded if they were non-comparative, or not including surgery involving the colon or rectum. A total of 15 studies with 589 patients who underwent SILC for colorectal cancer were selected.
Results: No significant differences between the groups were noted in terms of mortality or morbidity. The benefit of the SILC approach included reduction in conversion rate to laparotomy, but there were no significant differences in other short-term clinical outcomes between the groups. Satisfactory oncological surgical quality was also demonstrated for SILC for the treatment of colorectal cancer with a similar average lymph node harvest and proximal and distal resection margin length as multiport CLC.
Conclusion: SILC can be performed safely with similar short-term clinical and oncological outcomes as multiport CLC.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 10;16(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1521-4. World J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30414613 Free PMC article.
-
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series.Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):96-102. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1833-8. Epub 2011 Jul 27. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 21792717
-
Single-incision Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery: A Systemic Review, Meta-analysis, and Future Prospect.J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Apr 25;8(2):48-60. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2023-078. eCollection 2024. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024. PMID: 38689785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases.Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1317-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4371-y. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26139507
-
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jul;36(7):1407-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03918-6. Epub 2021 Apr 7. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33829313
Cited by
-
Anticipation of umbistoma in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection: Ileostomy and ostomy closure.J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018 Jul 30;2(3):77-82. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2017-037. eCollection 2018. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018. PMID: 31559347 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and risk factors for umbilical incisional hernia after reduced port colorectal surgery (SIL + 1 additional port)-is an umbilical midline approach really a problem?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 May;407(3):1241-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02416-1. Epub 2022 Jan 23. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022. PMID: 35066629
-
Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 4;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1721-6. World J Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31685027 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced recovery after surgery: Current research insights and future direction.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Feb 27;9(2):37-45. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i2.37. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017. PMID: 28289508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 10;16(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1521-4. World J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30414613 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–2229. - PubMed
-
- Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST. The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2011;254:933–940. - PubMed
-
- McNally ME, Todd Moore B, Brown KM. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3559–3565. - PubMed
-
- Papaconstantinou HT, Thomas JS. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery. 2011;150:820–827. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources