Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 13:2:32-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.12.002. eCollection 2015.

The economic burden of eating disorders and related mental health comorbidities: An exploratory analysis using the U.S. Medical Expenditures Panel Survey

Mihail Samnaliev  1 , H LeAnn Noh  2 , Kendrin R Sonneville  3 , S Bryn Austin  3
Affiliations

The economic burden of eating disorders and related mental health comorbidities: An exploratory analysis using the U.S. Medical Expenditures Panel Survey

Mihail Samnaliev et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Very little is known about the economic burden of eating disorders (ED) and related mental health comorbidities.

Methods: Using 5 years of data from the U.S. Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, we estimated the difference in annual health care costs, employment status, and earned income (2011 US$) between individuals with current ED compared to those without ED. We further estimated the contribution of mental health comorbidities to these disparities in health care costs, employment and earnings.

Results: Individuals with ED had greater annual health care costs ($1869, p = 0.012), lower but borderline significant employment rates (OR = 0.67, 95% CIs [0.41, 1.09]), and lower but not statistically significant earnings among those who were employed ($2093, p = 0.48), compared to individuals without ED. Among individuals with ED, the presence of mental health comorbidities was associated with higher but not statistically significant health care costs ($1993, p = 0.17), lower borderline significant odds of employment (OR = 0.41, 95% CIs [0.14, 1.20]), and significantly lower earnings ($19,374, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Treatment and prevention of ED may have broader economic benefits in terms of heath care savings and gains in work productivity than previously recognized. This exploratory study justifies large scale evaluations of the societal economic impact of eating disorders and comorbidities.

Keywords: Eating disorders; Economic burden; Lost productivity; Mental health comorbidities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hudson J.I., Hiripi E., Pope H.G., Jr., Kessler R.C. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biol. Psychiatry. 2007;61:348–358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swanson S.A., Crow S.J., Le Grange D., Swendsen J., Merikangas K.R. Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents. Results from the national comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2011;68(7):714–723. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stuhldreher N., Konnopka A., Wild B. Cost-of-illness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses in eating disorders: a systematic review. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2012;45:476–491. - PubMed
    1. Lynch F.L., Striegel-Moore R.H., Dickerson J.F., Perrin N., Debar L., Wilson G.T., Kraemer H.C. Cost-effectiveness of guided self-help treatment for recurrent binge eating. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2010;78(3):322–333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mond J.M., Hay P.J. Functional impairment associated with bulimic behaviors in a community sample of men and women. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2007;40(5):391–398. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources