Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 13:2:640-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.008. eCollection 2015.

Effect of mobile reminders on screening yield during opportunistic screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary health care setting: A randomized trial

Affiliations

Effect of mobile reminders on screening yield during opportunistic screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary health care setting: A randomized trial

Sathish Kumar et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Objective. We wanted to study whether mobile reminders increased follow-up for definitive tests resulting in higher screening yield during opportunistic screening for diabetes. Methods. This was a facility-based parallel randomized controlled trial during routine outpatient department hours in a primary health care setting in Puducherry, India (2014). We offered random blood glucose testing to non-pregnant non-diabetes adults with age >30 years (667 total, 390 consented); eligible outpatients (random blood glucose ≥ 6.1 mmol/l, n = 268) were requested to follow-up for definitive tests (fasting and postprandial blood glucose). Eligible outpatients either received (intervention arm, n = 133) or did not receive mobile reminder (control arm, n = 135) to follow-up for definitive tests. We measured capillary blood glucose using a glucometer to make epidemiological diagnosis of diabetes. The trial was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2014/10/005138). Results. 85.7% of outpatients in intervention arm returned for definitive test when compared to 53.3% in control arm [Relative Risk = 1.61, (0.95 Confidence Interval - 1.35, 1.91)]. Screening yield in intervention and control arm was 18.6% and 10.2% respectively. Etiologic fraction was 45.2% and number needed to screen was 11.9. Conclusion. In countries like India, which is emerging as the diabetes capital of the world, considering the wide prevalent use of mobile phones, and real life resource limited settings in which this study was carried out, mobile reminders during opportunistic screening in primary health care setting improve screening yield of diabetes.

Keywords: CI, confidence interval; CTRI, Clinical Trial Registry of India; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1C, glycosylated hemoglobin; India; Loss to follow-up; NNS, number needed to screen; NPCDCS, National Programme for Prevention and Control of Diabetes, Cardiovascular diseases and Stroke; OPD, Out Patient Department; Operational research; Opportunistic screening; Outpatients; PHC, Primary Health Centre; PPBG, postprandial blood glucose; Primary Health Centre; Primary health care; RBG, random blood glucose; RCT, randomized controlled trial; Randomized controlled trial; Reminder system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow during opportunistic screening for diabetes at Primary Health Centre, Lawspet, Puducherry, India (2014).

References

    1. Chatterjee R., Narayan K.M.V., Lipscomb J., Phillips L.S. Screening adults for pre-diabetes and diabetes may be cost-saving. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1484–1490. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark H.D., Graham I.D., Karovitch A., Keely E.J. Do postal reminders increase postpartum screening of diabetes mellitus in women with gestational diabetes mellitus? A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;634:e1–e7. - PubMed
    1. Oxford University Press; Geneva, Switzerland: 2006. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: Report of a WHO/IDF consultation.
    1. Ealovega M.W., Tabaei B.P., Brandle M., Burke R., Herman W.H. Opportunistic screening for diabetes in routine clinical practice. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:9–12. - PubMed
    1. Eborall H., Stone M., Aujla N., Taub N., Davies M., Khunti K. Influences on the uptake of diabetes screening: a qualitative study in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2012;62:e204–e211. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources