Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 13:2:664-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.002. eCollection 2015.

Navigating to health: Evaluation of a community health center patient navigation program

Affiliations

Navigating to health: Evaluation of a community health center patient navigation program

Monica L Wang et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Patient Navigators are trained, lay health care workers who guide patients in overcoming barriers to health care access and utilization. Little evidence exists regarding reach and impact of Patient Navigators for chronic disease management. This study evaluated a Patient Navigator program aimed at optimizing health care utilization among ethnically diverse patients with diabetes and/or hypertension at a community health center (CHC). Trained Patient Navigators contacted eligible patients who had not seen a primary care provider (PCP) for ≥ 6 months. Outcomes included number of patients reached by Patient Navigators and seen by PCPs after Patient Navigator contact. Distributions and frequencies of outcomes pre- and post-call were compared. A total of 215 patients had ≥ 1 call attempt from Patient Navigators. Of these, 74 were additionally contacted via mailed letters or at the time of a CHC visit. Among the 45 patients reached, 77.8% scheduled an appointment through the Patient Navigator. These patients had higher rates of PCP visits 6 months post-call (90%) than those not reached (42.2%) (p < 0.0001). Findings emphasize the value of direct telephone contact in patient health care re-engagement and may inform the development of future Patient Navigator programs to improve reach and effectiveness.

Keywords: Community health center; Patient engagement; Patient navigator; Program evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of Patient Navigator contact status and appointment show rate attempt among patients (N = 215) in a Massachusetts Community Health Center (2009–2013). *Reached denotes able to be directly contacted by Patient Navigator via phone. **Additional contact by the Patient Navigator included mailing an outreach letter to the patient and/or meeting the patient in-person when he or she came to the community health center for a visit.

References

    1. Paskett E.D., Harrop J.P., Wells K.J. Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:237–249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jean-Pierre P., Hendren S., Fiscella K. Understanding the processes of patient navigation to reduce disparities in cancer care: perspectives of trained navigators from the field. J. Cancer Educ. 2011;26:111–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pratt-Chapman M., Willis A. Community cancer center administration and support for navigation services. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2013;29:141–148. - PubMed
    1. Freeman H.P. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: 2001. Voices of a Broken System: Real People, Real Problems.
    1. Freeman H.P. A model patient navigation program. Oncol. Issues. 2004;19:44–46.

LinkOut - more resources