Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 9:3:127-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Jun.

Validation of self-rated overall diet quality by Healthy Eating Index-2010 score among New York City adults, 2013

Affiliations

Validation of self-rated overall diet quality by Healthy Eating Index-2010 score among New York City adults, 2013

Tamar K Adjoian et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Objective: Chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and cancer can result from a number of diet-related environmental and behavioral factors. Screening for poor diet is helpful in developing interventions to prevent chronic disease, but measuring dietary behavior can be costly and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to test the ability of a self-rated, single-item measure for evaluating diet quality among individuals and populations.

Methods: A 24-h dietary recall and single-item self-rated diet quality measure were collected for 485 adults. From dietary recalls, Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI) scores were computed and compared with self-rated diet quality. Data were collected in 2013 among adult (18 years and older) New York City residents.

Results: The study sample was 57% female, 47% white, 56% college educated, and 45% in the highest income tertile. The mean HEI score was 56.5 out of a possible 100. Women averaged higher HEI scores compared to men (58.1 vs 54.3, p = .01). There was a modest yet significant correlation between HEI scores and self-rated diet quality (ρ = 0.29, p < .01). Overall, mean HEI score increased as self-rated diet quality improved (from 48.2 for "poor" to 63.0 for "excellent").

Conclusions: The single-item measure of self-rated diet quality may provide a simple method of identifying those with the worst diet quality. Further investigation of this measure's validity is needed with alternative measures of dietary intake and with health outcomes.

Keywords: Diet quality; HEI-2010; Healthy Eating Index; Self-rated diet quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24) Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. 2011. http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/asa24/ (accessed August 2014)
    1. Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24) National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: 2011. HEI Tools for Researchers. (http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/hei/tools.html#intake accessed August 2014)
    1. Basiotis P.P., Welsh S.O., Cronin F.J. Number of days of food intake records required to estimate individual and group nutrient intakes with defined confidence. J. Nutr. 1987;117(9):1638–1641. - PubMed
    1. Elfassy T., Yi S., Immerwahr S. Vol. 24. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2013. Self-rated general health in New York City. (Epi Data Brief)
    1. Freedman L.S., Guenther P.M., Krebs-Smith S.M. A population's mean Health Eating Index-2005 scores are best estimated by the score of a population ratio when one 24-hour recall is available. J. Nutr. 2008;138(9):1725–1729. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources