Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Oct 25;2(12):1965-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.10.024. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Radiation-induced CD8 T-lymphocyte Apoptosis as a Predictor of Breast Fibrosis After Radiotherapy: Results of the Prospective Multicenter French Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Radiation-induced CD8 T-lymphocyte Apoptosis as a Predictor of Breast Fibrosis After Radiotherapy: Results of the Prospective Multicenter French Trial

David Azria et al. EBioMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Monocentric cohorts suggested that radiation-induced CD8 T-lymphocyte apoptosis (RILA) can predict late toxicity after curative intent radiotherapy (RT). We assessed the role of RILA as a predictor of breast fibrosis (bf +) after adjuvant breast RT in a prospective multicenter trial.

Methods: A total of 502 breast-cancer patients (pts) treated by conservative surgery and adjuvant RT were recruited at ten centers. RILA was assessed before RT by flow cytometry. Impact of RILA on bf + (primary endpoint) or relapse was assessed using a competing risk method. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were also performed in intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00893035 and final analyses are presented here.

Findings: Four hundred and fifty-six pts (90.8%) were included in the final analysis. One hundred and eight pts (23.7%) received whole breast and node irradiation. A boost dose of 10-16 Gy was delivered in 449 pts (98.5%). Adjuvant hormonotherapy was administered to 349 pts (76.5%). With a median follow-up of 38.6 months, grade ≥ 2 bf + was observed in 64 pts (14%). A decreased incidence of grade ≥ 2 bf + was observed for increasing values of RILA (p = 0.012). No grade 3 bf + was observed for patients with RILA ≥ 12%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.62. For cut-off values of RILA ≥ 20% and < 12%, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 34%, 56% and 67%, respectively. Negative predictive value for grade ≥ 2 bf + was equal to 91% for RILA ≥ 20% and positive predictive value was equal to 22% for RILA < 12% where the overall prevalence of grade ≥ 2 bf + was estimated at 14%. A significant decrease in the risk of grade ≥ 2 bf + was found if patients had no adjuvant hormonotherapy (sHR = 0.31, p = 0.007) and presented a RILA ≥ 12% (sHR = 0.45, p = 0.002).

Interpretation: RILA significantly predicts the risk of breast fibrosis. This study validates the use of RILA as a rapid screening test before RT delivery and will change definitely our daily clinical practice in radiation oncology.

Funding: The French National Cancer Institute (INCa) through the "Program Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC)".

Keywords: Apoptosis; Breast fibrosis; Lymphocyte; Prediction; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial profile.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 late side effects (BF-FS, breast fibrosis-free survival) and relapses (RFS, relapse-free survival). Breast fibrosis component (a) and relapse component (b) for two categories (< 12 and ≥ 12) of radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis (RILA) are presented. Breast fibrosis component (c) and relapse component (d) for three categories (< 12, 12–20, and ≥ 20) of RILA are presented.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cumulative incidence of first events according to radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis (RILA). Univariate (a) and multivariate (b) analyses for three categories (< 12, 12–20, and ≥ 20) of RILA are presented. Univariate (c) and multivariate (d) analyses for two categories (< 12 and ≥ 12) of RILA are presented.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Ghazal S.K., Fallowfield L., Blamey R.W. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 1999;25(6):571–573. (Epub 1999/11/11) - PubMed
    1. Altman D.G., McShane L.M., Sauerbrei W., Taube S.E. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2012;9(5) (Epub 2012/06/08) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arriagada R., Rutqvist L.E., Kramar A., Johansson H. Competing risks determining event-free survival in early breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 1992;66(5):951–957. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azria D., Gourgou S., Sozzi W.J. Concomitant use of tamoxifen with radiotherapy enhances subcutaneous breast fibrosis in hypersensitive patients. Br. J. Cancer. 2004;91(7):1251–1260. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azria D., Ozsahin M., Kramar A. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, apoptosis, and the development of severe late adverse effects after radiotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14(19):6284–6288. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data