Liver Fibrosis Staging with MR Elastography: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and Those with Other Etiologic Causes
- PMID: 26844364
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016150397
Liver Fibrosis Staging with MR Elastography: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and Those with Other Etiologic Causes
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography in staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and other etiologic causes. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was institutional review board-approved and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Before surgery, MR elastographic imaging was performed in 352 patients with chronic liver diseases (281 patients with CHB, 71 patients without CHB) and hepatocellular carcinomas and 64 living liver donor candidates. Liver stiffness (LS) values were measured on quantitative shear-stiffness maps of MR elastography, and the diagnostic performance of MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the Obuchowski measure with the histopathologic analysis of liver fibrosis in the CHB group and in the group composed of other etiologic causes. In 120 patients (97 with CHB, 23 without CHB) and 51 donors, diagnostic performance of MR elastography was validated. Results Areas under the curve of LS values for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥stage F2), severe fibrosis (≥stage F3), and cirrhosis (stage F4) in the CHB group were 0.972 (95% confidence interval: 0.948, 0.987), 0.946 (95% confidence interval: 0.916, 0.968), and 0.920 (95% confidence interval: 0.885, 0.947), respectively. Obuchowski measures were similarly high in the CHB group and in the group composed of other etiologic causes (0.970 vs 0.977). However, the estimated cutoff value for stage F4 in the group with CHB was substantially lower than in the participants with other etiologic causes: 3.67 kPa versus 4.65 kPa. In the validation study for stage F1 or greater, stage F2 or greater, stage F3 or greater, and stage F4, the Youden indexes were 0.807, 0.842, 0.806, and 0.639, respectively, in the group with CHB, and 0.783, 0.900, 1.000, and 0.917, respectively, in the group without CHB. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of MR elastography in liver fibrosis staging was similarly high in the groups with and without CHB, but the cutoff LS values for diagnosing liver cirrhosis differed between the groups with and without CHB. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Similar articles
-
Hepatic fibrosis: prospective comparison of MR elastography and US shear-wave elastography for evaluation.Radiology. 2014 Dec;273(3):772-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132000. Epub 2014 Jul 7. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 25007047
-
Diffusion-weighted MRI-based Virtual Elastography for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis.Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):127-135. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191498. Epub 2020 Feb 11. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32043948
-
Accuracy of transient elastography in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis: A multicentre, retrospective study.Liver Int. 2015 Oct;35(10):2246-55. doi: 10.1111/liv.12808. Epub 2015 Feb 26. Liver Int. 2015. PMID: 25682719
-
Assessment of biopsy-proven liver fibrosis by two-dimensional shear wave elastography: An individual patient data-based meta-analysis.Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):260-272. doi: 10.1002/hep.29179. Epub 2017 Nov 15. Hepatology. 2018. PMID: 28370257 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Two-dimensional shear wave elastography for significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Radiol. 2020 Mar;124:108839. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108839. Epub 2020 Jan 17. Eur J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31981878
Cited by
-
Comparison between ROI-based and volumetric measurements in quantifying heterogeneity of liver stiffness using MR elastography.Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1609-1615. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06478-0. Epub 2019 Nov 8. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31705257
-
Magnetic resonance elastography in evaluation of liver fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease.Insights Imaging. 2023 Feb 28;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01390-0. Insights Imaging. 2023. PMID: 36854936 Free PMC article.
-
Liver Fibrosis Quantification by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Dec;26(6):229-241. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000149. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28858038 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Navigating Complex Challenges: Preoperative Assessment and Surgical Strategies for Liver Resection in Patients with Fibrosis or Cirrhosis.Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 6;12(6):1264. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061264. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 38927471 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Nov;45(11):3444-3462. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02656-7. Epub 2020 Jul 23. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020. PMID: 32705312 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous