Phase III Study on Efficacy and Safety of Triple Combination (Exenatide/Metformin/Biphasic Insulin Aspart) Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- PMID: 26844723
- DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000431
Phase III Study on Efficacy and Safety of Triple Combination (Exenatide/Metformin/Biphasic Insulin Aspart) Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Abstract
Exenatide, metformin (MET), and biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIA30) have been widely used in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, each of these medications has significant adverse effects, which limit their utilization. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple combination (exenatide/metformin/biphasic insulin aspart) therapy for T2DM. Two hundred patients with poorly controlled T2DM were randomly divided into the low-dose (0.5 μg exenatide, 0.05 U·kg·d BIA30, and 0.01 g MET twice daily) and normal-dose (2 μg exenatide, 0.2 U·kg·d BIA30, and 0.05 g MET twice daily) groups for 48 weeks of treatment. Of note, 82 and 90 individuals from the low-dose and normal-dose groups, respectively, completed the study. The levels of adiponectin, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α, and resistin were measured. The normal-dose treatment was more effective at lowering hemoglobin A1c levels than the low-dose therapy (HbA1c changes of -2.5 ± 0.19% and -0.8 ± 0.07%, respectively) after 48 weeks. The maximum weight decrease was 0.9 kg in the low-dose group and 4.0 kg in the normal-dose group. The triple combination therapy increased the levels of insulin sensitivity and adiponectin and reduced the levels of C-reactive protein, resistin, and tumor necrosis factor-α. No significant difference in the adverse effects was found between the low-dose and normal-dose groups (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the investigated triple combination therapy for T2MD is therefore an effective and safe therapeutic strategy.
Similar articles
-
The study of once- and twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) with sitagliptin, and twice-daily BIAsp 30 without sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on sitagliptin and metformin-The Sit2Mix trial.Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Oct;9(5):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Prim Care Diabetes. 2015. PMID: 25488587 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized, open-label, multicentre, parallel-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 30 plus metformin with biphasic insulin aspart 30 monotherapy for type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs: The merit study.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2740-2747. doi: 10.1111/dom.13454. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018. PMID: 29961975 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of a soluble co-formulation of insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial.Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 Aug;167(2):287-94. doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-0293. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012. PMID: 22660026 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Once weekly exenatide: efficacy, tolerability and place in therapy.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Oct;15(10):871-81. doi: 10.1111/dom.12084. Epub 2013 Mar 24. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013. PMID: 23425609 Review.
-
Glucose-lowering treatment of type 2 diabetes. Part II--Glucose-lowering drugs after metformin: a choice based largely on adverse effects.Prescrire Int. 2015 May;24(160):130-5. Prescrire Int. 2015. PMID: 26034806 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Effects of Insulin Aspart Combined with Acarbose and Metformin in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 8;2022:3541931. doi: 10.1155/2022/3541931. eCollection 2022. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022. Retraction in: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Jun 21;2023:9805178. doi: 10.1155/2023/9805178. PMID: 35845580 Free PMC article. Retracted.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous