Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0147003.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147003. eCollection 2016.

Using Win-Win Strategies to Implement Health in All Policies: A Cross-Case Analysis

Agnes Molnar  1 , Emilie Renahy  1 , Patricia O'Campo  1   2 , Carles Muntaner  2   3 , Alix Freiler  1 , Ketan Shankardass  1   2   4
Affiliations

Using Win-Win Strategies to Implement Health in All Policies: A Cross-Case Analysis

Agnes Molnar et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: In spite of increasing research into intersections of public policy and health, little evidence shows how policy processes impact the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives. Our research sought to understand how and why strategies for engaging partners from diverse policy sectors in the implementation of HiAP succeed or fail in order to uncover the underlying social mechanisms contributing to sustainable implementation of HiAP.

Methods: In this explanatory multiple case study, we analyzed grey and peer-review literature and key informant interviews to identify mechanisms leading to implementation successes and failures in relation to different strategies for engagement across three case studies (Sweden, Quebec and South Australia), after accounting for the role of different contextual conditions.

Findings: Our results yielded no support for the use of awareness-raising or directive strategies as standalone approaches for engaging partners to implement HiAP. However, we found strong evidence that mechanisms related to "win-win" strategies facilitated implementation by increasing perceived acceptability (or buy-in) and feasibility of HiAP implementation across sectors. Win-win strategies were facilitated by mechanisms related to several activities, including: the development of a shared language to facilitate communication between actors from different sectors; integrating health into other policy agendas (eg., sustainability) and use of dual outcomes to appeal to the interests of diverse policy sectors; use of scientific evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of HiAP; and using health impact assessment to make policy coordination for public health outcomes more feasible and to give credibility to policies being developed by diverse policy sectors.

Conclusion: Our findings enrich theoretical understanding in an under-unexplored area of intersectoral action. They also provide policy makers with examples of HiAP across wealthy welfare regimes, and improve understanding of successful HiAP implementation practices, including the win-win approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Conceptual Framework for Implementation of HiAP.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Refined Conceptual Framework–Agenda setting.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Refined Conceptual Framework–Capacity building.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ståhl T., Wismar M., Ollila E., Lahtinen E., & Leppo K. (Eds.). (2006). Health in All Policies Prospects and Potentials Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
    1. Leppo K., Ollila E., Peña S., Wismar M., & Cook S. (2013). Health in All Policies—Seizing opportunities, implementing policies Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
    1. World Health Organization. (2013). Health 2020: a European policy framework Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.
    1. Shankardass K., Solar O., Murphy K., Freiler A., Bobbili S., Bayoumi A., et al., Health in All Policies: Results of a Realist-Informed Scoping Review of the Literature, in Getting Started With Health in All Policies: A Report to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. 2011, Centre for Research on Inner City Health: Toronto: (http://www.stmichaelshospital.com/crich/reports/hiap/).
    1. McQueen, D. V., Wismar, M., Lin, V., Jones, C. M., & Davies, M. (Eds.). (2012). Intersectoral governance for health in all policies Structures, actions and experiences. Observatory Studies Series World Health Organization 2012, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources