Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2016 Feb 5:20:22.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1188-6.

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult neurocritical care patients--no firm evidence for benefit or harm

Mette Krag  1 , Anders Perner  2 , Jørn Wetterslev  3 , Morten Hylander Møller  4   5
Affiliations
Comment

Stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult neurocritical care patients--no firm evidence for benefit or harm

Mette Krag et al. Crit Care. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liu B, Liu S, Yin A, Siddiqi J. Risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult neurocritical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2015;19:409. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1107-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:763–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Savovic J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Juni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:429–38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Wise MP, Moller MH. Trials on stress ulcer prophylaxis: finding the balance between benefit and harm. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1367–8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3860-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms