Clinical practice recommendations for quality of life assessment in patients with gynecological cancer
- PMID: 26848300
- PMCID: PMC4733903
- DOI: 10.5114/pm.2015.56539
Clinical practice recommendations for quality of life assessment in patients with gynecological cancer
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is a multidimensional concept regarding self-assessment of patients' situation. Quality of life has not been clearly defined up to date, although it is clear that it is a subjective self-assessment that to a significant extent is determined by individual needs, beliefs, values, attitudes, which are changing with time. Health-related QoL comprises basic dimensions such as patients' performance status, physical, emotional, and social functioning, symptoms of the disease and adverse effects of treatment, spiritual (God and existential) and other dimensions. In women, the ovary, cervical, corpus uterus, vagina and vulva cancers deteriorate QoL by disease progression and consequences of treatment, also in cancer survivors. Common symptoms include the genito-urinary system, the lower gastrointestinal tract and peripheral neuropathies induced by chemotherapy. In young women, QoL is impaired by infertility, sexual problems and menopause symptoms. An overview of QoL questionnaires used in oncology with special regard to patients with gynecological tumors was conducted. A screening tool for psychological state assessment of oncology patients (distress thermometer), the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and modular approach of QoL assessment recommended by the EORTC (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer) were presented. Practical guidelines were proposed to assess appropriately QoL in patients with gynecological cancers who stay at in-patient gynecology units and those treated at home and in an ambulatory care setting.
Keywords: gynecological cancer; oncology; quality of life; supportive care; symptoms.
Figures










Similar articles
-
Unmet needs for information and psychosocial support in relation to quality of life and emotional distress: A comparison between gynecological and breast cancer patients.Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Oct;100(10):1934-1942. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 May 24. Patient Educ Couns. 2017. PMID: 28592366
-
The impact of automated screening with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) on health-related quality of life, supportive care needs, and patient satisfaction with care in 268 ambulatory cancer patients.Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jan;27(1):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4304-0. Epub 2018 Jun 21. Support Care Cancer. 2019. PMID: 29931490
-
Cross-Sectional Patient-Reported Outcome Measuring of Health-Related Quality of Life With Establishment of Cancer- and Treatment-Specific Functional and Symptom Scales in Patients With Penile Cancer.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Dec;16(6):e1215-e1220. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Aug 11. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30201215
-
Long-term quality of life in gynecological cancer survivors.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;22(1):30-5. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332e626. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 19809316 Review.
-
Long-Term Survival of Women with Breast Cancer. Overview Supportive Care Needs Assessment Instruments.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;989:281-284. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_25. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 28971436 Review.
Cited by
-
Quality of Life in Patients with Gynecological Cancers: A Web-Based Study.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Jul 1;21(7):1969-1975. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.7.1969. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020. PMID: 32711422 Free PMC article.
-
A Critical Review of Instruments Measuring the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in Iranian Studies and Their Psychometrics Properties.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):333-343. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.333. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019. PMID: 30803191 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Chemotherapy Patient Education Using the Teach-Back Method on Symptom Management and Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jan 7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02564-0. Online ahead of print. J Cancer Educ. 2025. PMID: 39775237
-
Comparison of the JCAHO Scoring System and the ESAS Scoring System in Determining the Palliative Care Needs of Gynecological Cancer Patients Treated at Hasan Sadikin Hospital.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):3611-3616. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3611. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022. PMID: 36444571 Free PMC article.
-
Presence of gastro-intestinal symptoms in ovarian cancer patients during survivorship: a cross-sectional study from the PROFILES registry.Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jun;27(6):2285-2293. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4510-9. Epub 2018 Oct 17. Support Care Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30328539 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shipper H. Quality of life. Principles of the clinical paradigm. J Psychol Oncol. 1990;8:171–185.
-
- Aaronson NK, Cull A, Kaasa S, et al. Modułowe postępowanie Europejskiej Organizacji do Badań i Leczenia Raka (EORTC) do oceny jakości życia chorych na nowotwory. Modyfikacja. In: Meyza J, editor. Jakość życia w chorobie nowotworowej. Warszawa: Centrum Onkologii; 1997. pp. 13–36.
-
- Brzeziński J. Metodologiczny i etyczny kontekst badań nad jakością życia. In: Bańka A, Derbis R, editors. Psychologiczne i pedagogiczne wymiary jakości życia. Częstochowa: UAM Poznań i WSP; 1994. pp. 11–18.
-
- De Walden Gałuszko K. Jakość życia – rozważania ogólne. In: De Walden Gałuszko K, Majkowicz M, editors. Jakość życia w chorobie nowotworowej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego; 1994. pp. 13–40.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources