Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jan;43(1):3-9.
doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.1.3. Epub 2016 Jan 15.

Mandibular Reconstruction Using the Free Vascularized Fibula Graft: An Overview of Different Modifications

Affiliations
Review

Mandibular Reconstruction Using the Free Vascularized Fibula Graft: An Overview of Different Modifications

George Kokosis et al. Arch Plast Surg. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

The reconstruction of the mandible is a complex procedure because various cosmetic as well as functional challenges must be addressed, including mastication and oral competence. Many surgical techniques have been described to address these challenges, including non-vascularized bone grafts, vascularized bone grafts, and approaches related to tissue engineering. This review summarizes different modifications of the free vascularized fibula graft, which, since its introduction by Hidalgo in 1989, has become the first option for mandibular reconstruction. The fibula free flap can undergo various modifications according to the individual requirements of a particular reconstruction. Osteocutaneous flaps can be harvested for reconstruction of composite defects. 'Double-barreling' of the fibula can, for instance, enable enhanced aesthetic and functional results, as well as immediate one-stage osseointegrated dental implantation. Recently described preoperative virtual surgery planning to facilitate neomandible remodeling could guarantee good results. To conclude, the free fibula bone graft can currently be regarded as the "gold standard" for mandibular reconstruction in case of composite (inside and outside) oral cavity defects as well as a way of enabling the performance of one-stage dental implantation.

Keywords: Fibula; Mandibular reconstruction; Microsurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. In-situ osteoseptocutaneous fibula flap
Osteoseptocutaneous fibula flap immediately after harvest, including the skin paddle. The skin island is located between the middle and distal third of the fibula (markings).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Double-skin island osteoseptoctaneous fibula free flap
In this patient after major mandibular resection for osteosarcoma, the double-skin island osteoseptocutaneous fibula free flap is used for simultaneous reconstruction of a soft tissue defect externally (A) and intraorally (B). The photograph depicts the immediate reconstructive result at the end of the procedure.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Radiographic appearance of double-barrel fibula free flap
Postoperative panorex depicts the typical configuration of a double-barrel fibula free flap. The flap is well aligned and held stable by the plate.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Preparation of three-dimensional models of fibula grafts prior to surgery
(A) Prefabricated plate bend on a three-dimensional model of the neomandible. (B) Cutting guide for in situ donor-site osteotomies. (C) In situ construct of prefabricated plate and osteotomized fibula.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Erdmann D, Giessler GA, Bergquist GE, et al. Free fibula transfer: analysis of 76 consecutive microsurgical procedures and review of the literature. Chirurg. 2004;75:799–809. - PubMed
    1. Wallace CG, Chang YM, Tsai CY, et al. Harnessing the potential of the free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:305–314. - PubMed
    1. Foster RD, Anthony JP, Sharma A, et al. Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success. Head Neck. 1999;21:66–71. - PubMed
    1. Pogrel MA, Podlesh S, Anthony JP, et al. A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1200–1206. - PubMed
    1. Chim H, Salgado CJ, Mardini S, et al. Reconstruction of mandibular defects. Semin Plast Surg. 2010;24:188–197. - PMC - PubMed