Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0143893.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143893. eCollection 2016.

Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Saudis towards Participating in Clinical Trials

Affiliations

Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Saudis towards Participating in Clinical Trials

Mohamad A Al-Tannir et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Saudis towards participating in clinical trials (CTs).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 232 Saudi adult patients and their companions visiting adult outpatient clinics at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire based on information obtained from the literature. The questionnaire was divided into four sections, one covering the respondents' demographics, and the other three assessing knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions towards participating in CTs.

Results: A total of 148 (63.8%) respondents were males, and 52 (22.4%) participants had been invited to participate in a CT previously. Of those, 39 (75%) participated. Knowledge about the essential elements of informed consent ranged from 55.7% (number of participants needed) to 85.7% (confidentiality of personal information). The majority (163, 73.8%) of respondents was willing to participate in a CT after consulting their family physician and 130 (58.0%) respondents would be motivated to participate in a CT if they were healthy. Only 36.8% of the respondents believed that patients who participated in a CT received the best care. Moreover, 110 (48.7%) respondents believed that research was conducted in a responsible and ethical manner.

Conclusions: The present study assessed the current understanding of CTs among Saudi participants. Although the majority of participants had an acceptable level of knowledge about CTs, they exhibited conditional attitudes and misperceptions towards participating in a CT. Increased patient awareness may improve patients' attitudes towards ethical conduct of CTs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2001. Available: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/index
    1. Toerien M, Brookes ST, Metcalfe C. A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials 2009; 10: 52 10.1186/1745-6215-10-52 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson EJ, Kerr CEP, Stevens AJ, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, et al. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9: 1–192. - PubMed
    1. Featherstone K, Donovan JL. Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it? The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55: 709–719. - PubMed
    1. Comis RL1, Miller JD, Aldigé CR, Krebs L, Stoval E. Public Attitudes toward Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 830–835. - PubMed

Publication types