A Comparison of Personal Protective Standards: Caring for Patients With Ebola Virus
- PMID: 26848906
- DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000183
A Comparison of Personal Protective Standards: Caring for Patients With Ebola Virus
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to discuss the variance in requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE) used among healthcare workers to treat patients actively infected with the Ebola virus in West Africa.
Background: The Ebola virus is a highly contagious disease, which has killed 11020 people within the past year. In order to combat the disease and treat those with active infections, healthcare workers are required to use PPE. The guidelines for the PPE, in addition to the requirements of what should be worn, are varied between the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Description: A military unit was composed of sister services (Army, Navy, and Air Force) deployed to Monrovia, Liberia, to assist in mitigating the devastating effects of the Ebola virus. Each service member was taught PPE standards according to the WHO and were assigned to teach healthcare workers from around the world on how to manage the care of patients infected with the Ebola virus, while simultaneously taking diligent precautions to protect themselves against the deadly disease.
Outcome: More than 1500 healthcare workers were instructed on the latest PPE standards before they entered into the Ebola treatment units (ETUs) that were being constructed in Liberia. Cumulative death rates from the Ebola virus in Liberia increased from 2413 in October 2014 to 3686 by January 2015.
Conclusion/implications for practice: The rapid decline in Ebola mortality is multifactorial. The efforts of US military medical personnel likely were a contributing factor in this rapid decline as those international health workers were afforded the latest in PPE training with strict attention to detail. US military medical personnel, in concert with other governmental agencies, created a potent force multiplier in the efforts to curb this deadly infection. The educational initiative was essential to the slowdown in the spread of the Ebola virus in Liberia. Recommendations for a detailed review of the PPE standards and variances in practice from both WHO and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are necessary to standardize processes across international healthcare workers to expedite the care for future infectious disease outbreaks. A possible solution is to modify the PPE process to standardize with the WHO guidelines. Key stakeholders from all levels (staff nurse, clinical nurse specialist, nurse managers, infectious disease experts, etc) need to be heavily involved in this process.
Similar articles
-
Personal protective equipment solution for UK military medical personnel working in an Ebola virus disease treatment unit in Sierra Leone.J Hosp Infect. 2017 May;96(1):42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Mar 18. J Hosp Infect. 2017. PMID: 28420487 Free PMC article.
-
Foreign Medical Teams in support of the Ebola outbreak: a UK military model of pre-deployment training and assurance.J R Army Med Corps. 2016 Jun;162(3):163-8. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2016-000620. J R Army Med Corps. 2016. PMID: 27231284
-
Monitoring Exposure to Ebola and Health of U.S. Military Personnel Deployed in Support of Ebola Control Efforts - Liberia, October 25, 2014-February 27, 2015.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Jul 3;64(25):690-4. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015. PMID: 26135589 Free PMC article.
-
Personal Protective Equipment: Protecting Health Care Providers in an Ebola Outbreak.Clin Ther. 2015 Nov 1;37(11):2402-2410. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Clin Ther. 2015. PMID: 26452427 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[West Africa Ebola outbreak - immediate and hands-on formation: the pre-deployment training program for frontline aid workers of the German Red Cross, other aid organizations, and the German Armed Forces, Wuerzburg, Germany 2014/15].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Apr;61(4):394-403. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2710-6. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018. PMID: 29480365 Review. German.
Cited by
-
A unified personal protective equipment ensemble for clinical response to possible high consequence infectious diseases: A consensus document on behalf of the HCID programme.J Infect. 2018 Dec;77(6):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 31. J Infect. 2018. PMID: 30176274 Free PMC article.
-
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5(5):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32412096 Free PMC article.
-
Hand Hygiene Practices and Microbial Investigation of Hand Contact Swab among Physiotherapists in an Ebola Endemic Region: Implications for Public Health.Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5841805. doi: 10.1155/2017/5841805. Epub 2017 Jun 11. Biomed Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28691027 Free PMC article.
-
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 15;4(4):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5:CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub5. PMID: 32293717 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ventilatory support in chemical, biological and radiological emergencies.Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3347. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4024.3347. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020. PMID: 32876287 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous