Costs of Rearing the Wrong Sex: Cross-Fostering to Manipulate Offspring Sex in Tammar Wallabies
- PMID: 26849128
- PMCID: PMC4743941
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146011
Costs of Rearing the Wrong Sex: Cross-Fostering to Manipulate Offspring Sex in Tammar Wallabies
Abstract
Sex allocation theory assumes that offspring sex (son vs. daughter) has consequences for maternal fitness. The most compelling experiment to test this theory would involve manipulating offspring sex and measuring the fitness consequences of having the "wrong" sex. Unfortunately, the logistical challenges of such an experiment limit its application. In tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii), previous evidence suggests that mothers in good body condition are more likely to produce sons compared to mothers in poor condition, in support of the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis (TW) of condition-dependent sex allocation. More recently, we have found in our population of tammar wallabies that females with seemingly poor access to resources (based on condition loss over the dry summer) are more likely to produce sons, consistent with predictions from the Local Resource Competition (LRC) hypothesis, which proposes that production of sons or daughters is driven by the level of potential competition between mothers and philopatric daughters. We conducted a cross-fostering experiment in free-ranging tammar wallabies to disassociate the effects of rearing and birthing offspring of each sex. This allowed us to test the prediction of the LRC hypothesis that rearing daughters reduces the future direct fitness of mothers post-weaning and the prediction of the TW hypothesis that rearing sons requires more energy during lactation. Overall, we found limited costs to the mother of rearing the "wrong" sex, with switching of offspring sex only reducing the likelihood of a mother having a pouch young the following year. Thus, we found some support for both hypotheses in that rearing an unexpected son or an unexpected daughter both lead to reduced future maternal fitness. The study suggests that there may be context-specific costs associated with rearing the "wrong" sex.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Milk composition during lactation suggests a mechanism for male biased allocation of maternal resources in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii).PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e51099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051099. Epub 2012 Nov 30. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23226470 Free PMC article.
-
Offspring sex varies with maternal investment ability: empirical demonstration based on cross-fostering.Biol Lett. 2010 Apr 23;6(2):242-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0774. Epub 2009 Nov 18. Biol Lett. 2010. PMID: 19923139 Free PMC article.
-
Parental investment in the Columbian ground squirrel: empirical tests of sex allocation models.Ecology. 2021 Nov;102(11):e03479. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3479. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Ecology. 2021. PMID: 34270793
-
Offspring sex ratio in mammals and the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: In pursuit of unambiguous evidence.Bioessays. 2017 Sep;39(9). doi: 10.1002/bies.201700043. Epub 2017 Jul 6. Bioessays. 2017. PMID: 28681935 Review.
-
Sexual differentiation in three unconventional mammals: spotted hyenas, elephants and tammar wallabies.Horm Behav. 2005 Nov;48(4):403-17. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Sep 28. Horm Behav. 2005. PMID: 16197946 Review.
Cited by
-
Are brood sex ratios adaptive?-The effect of experimentally altered brood sex ratio on nestling growth, mortality and recruitment.J Evol Biol. 2023 Jan;36(1):156-168. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14118. Epub 2022 Nov 14. J Evol Biol. 2023. PMID: 36373752 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal longevity and offspring sex in wild ungulates.Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 13;286(1896):20181968. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1968. Proc Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30963926 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual conflict in action: An antagonistic relationship between maternal and paternal sex allocation in the tammar wallaby, Notamacropus eugenii.Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr 5;9(8):4340-4348. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4813. eCollection 2019 Apr. Ecol Evol. 2019. PMID: 31031909 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Charnov EL. The theory of sex allocation Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1982. - PubMed
-
- West SA. Sex Allocation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2009.
-
- Trivers RL, Willard DE. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973; 179:90–92. - PubMed
-
- Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE. Great expectations: dominance, breeding success and offspring sex ratios in red deer. Anim Behav. 1986; 34:460–471.
-
- Hewison AJM, Gaillard J-M. Successful sons or advantaged daughters? The Trivers–Willard model and sex-biased maternal investment in ungulates. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 14:229–234. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources