Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148037.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148037. eCollection 2016.

The Affective Slider: A Digital Self-Assessment Scale for the Measurement of Human Emotions

Affiliations

The Affective Slider: A Digital Self-Assessment Scale for the Measurement of Human Emotions

Alberto Betella et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Self-assessment methods are broadly employed in emotion research for the collection of subjective affective ratings. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), a pictorial scale developed in the eighties for the measurement of pleasure, arousal, and dominance, is still among the most popular self-reporting tools, despite having been conceived upon design principles which are today obsolete. By leveraging on state-of-the-art user interfaces and metacommunicative pictorial representations, we developed the Affective Slider (AS), a digital self-reporting tool composed of two slider controls for the quick assessment of pleasure and arousal. To empirically validate the AS, we conducted a systematic comparison between AS and SAM in a task involving the emotional assessment of a series of images taken from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), a database composed of pictures representing a wide range of semantic categories often used as a benchmark in psychological studies. Our results show that the AS is equivalent to SAM in the self-assessment of pleasure and arousal, with two added advantages: the AS does not require written instructions and it can be easily reproduced in latest-generation digital devices, including smartphones and tablets. Moreover, we compared new and normative IAPS ratings and found a general drop in reported arousal of pictorial stimuli. Not only do our results demonstrate that legacy scales for the self-report of affect can be replaced with new measurement tools developed in accordance to modern design principles, but also that standardized sets of stimuli which are widely adopted in research on human emotion are not as effective as they were in the past due to a general desensitization towards highly arousing content.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), adapted with permission from Bradley and Lang 1994 [6].
SAM is a pictorial tool designed in the eighties that measures pleasure (top), arousal (middle) and dominance (bottom) on a discrete scale. It is available in two main versions: paper-and-pencil (5-, 7-, 9-points) and computer program (20-points). Participants can rate their affective state by placing an X over or between any figure.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The “Affective Slider” (AS) is a digital self-reporting tool composed of two sliders that measure arousal (top) and pleasure (bottom) on a continuous scale.
The AS does not require written instructions and it is intentionally displayed using a neutral chromatic palette to avoid bias in ratings due to the emotional connotation of colors. See text for more details.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Screenshot of the web-based questionnaire showing a single experimental trial using the AS.
The picture (in this example just a placeholder and not part of the IAPS collection) is randomly displayed either on the left or on the right side of the screen. Similarly, the order of the pleasure and arousal dimensions is randomized.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Scatterplots representing the linear correlation between AS and SAM pleasure (rs = .852) and arousal (rs = .860).
The red line indicates the best fit.

References

    1. Darwin C. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals Phoenix Books. University of Chicago Press; 1965.
    1. James W. What is an Emotion? Mind. 1884;9(34):pp. 188–205. 10.1093/mind/os-IX.34.188 - DOI
    1. Picard RW, Healey J. Affective wearables. Personal Technologies. 1997;1(4):231–240. 10.1007/BF01682026 - DOI
    1. Fahrenberg J, Myrtek M, Pawlik K, Perrez M. Ambulatory Assessment—Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2007. January;23(4):206–213. 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206 - DOI
    1. Betella A, Zucca R, Cetnarski R, Greco A, Lanatà A, Mazzei D, et al. Inference of Human Affective States from Psychophysiological Measurements Extracted under Ecologically Valid Conditions. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2014;8(286). 10.3389/fnins.2014.00286 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources