Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;30(1):e7-e11.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000391.

Early Mechanical Failures of the Synthes Variable Angle Locking Distal Femur Plate

Affiliations

Early Mechanical Failures of the Synthes Variable Angle Locking Distal Femur Plate

Jason C Tank et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To document the high failure rate of a specific implant: the Synthes Variable Angle (VA) Locking Distal Femur Plate.

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Urban University Level I Trauma Center.

Patient/participants: All distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33-A, B, C) treated from March 2011 through August 2013 were reviewed from our institutional orthopaedic trauma registry. Inclusion criteria were fractures treated with a precontoured distal femoral locking plate and age between 18 and 84. Exclusion criteria were fractures treated with intramedullary nails, arthroplasty, non-precontoured plates, dual plating, or screw fixation alone. The population was divided into 3 groups: less invasive stabilization system (LISS) group (n = 21), treated with LISS plates (Synthes, Paoli, PA); locking condylar plates (LCPs) group (n = 10), treated with LCPs (Synthes, Paoli, PA); and VA group (n = 36), treated with VA distal femoral LCPs (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Average age was 54.6 ± 17.5 years.

Intervention: Open reduction internal fixation with one of the above implants was performed.

Main outcome measures: The patients were followed radiographically for early mechanical implant failure defined as loosening of locking screws, loss of fixation, plate bending, or implant failure.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups for age, gender, open fracture, mechanism of injury, or medial comminution. There were 3 failures (14.3%) in group LISS, no failures (0%) in group LCP, and 8 failures (22.2%) in group VA. All 3 failures in group LISS were in A-type fractures (2 periprosthetic) and all failures in group VA were in C-type fractures. When all fractures for all 3 groups were compared for failure rate, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.23). However, when only 33-C fractures were compared, there was significantly greater failure rate in the VA group (P = 0.03). The mean time to failure in group VA was 147 days (range 24-401 days) and was significantly earlier (P = 0.034) when compared with group LISS (mean 356 days; range 251-433 days).

Conclusions: Early mechanical failure with the VA distal femoral locking plate is higher than traditional locking plates (LCP and LISS) for OTA/AO 33-C fractures. We caution practicing surgeons against the use of this plate for metaphyseal fragmented distal femur fractures.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Distal Femur VA-LCP Failures--Is There Really a Mechanical Problem?
    Lee M, Stoffel K. Lee M, et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30(5):e186. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000574. J Orthop Trauma. 2016. PMID: 27010183 No abstract available.
  • In response.
    Gary JL, Achor TS, Munz JW, Choo AS, Tank JC. Gary JL, et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 May;30(5):e186-7. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000482833.13212.6b. J Orthop Trauma. 2016. PMID: 27101170 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms