Comparison of Three Screening Test Kits for G6PD Enzyme Deficiency: Implications for Its Use in the Radical Cure of Vivax Malaria in Remote and Resource-Poor Areas in the Philippines
- PMID: 26849445
- PMCID: PMC4743845
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148172
Comparison of Three Screening Test Kits for G6PD Enzyme Deficiency: Implications for Its Use in the Radical Cure of Vivax Malaria in Remote and Resource-Poor Areas in the Philippines
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated a battery of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase diagnostic point-of-care tests (PoC) to assess the most suitable product in terms of performance and operational characteristics for remote areas.
Methods: Samples were collected in Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines and tested for G6PD deficiency with a fluorescent spot test (FST; Procedure 203, Trinity Biotech, Ireland), the semiquantitative WST8/1-methoxy PMS (WST; Dojindo, Japan) and the Carestart G6PD Rapid Diagnostic Test (CSG; AccessBio, USA). Results were compared to spectrophotometry (Procedure 345, Trinity Biotech, Ireland). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each test with cut-off activities of 10%, 20%, 30% and 60% of the adjusted male median.
Results: The adjusted male median was 270.5 IU/10(12) RBC. FST and WST were tested on 621 capillary blood samples, the CSG was tested on venous and capillary blood on 302 samples. At 30% G6PD activity, sensitivity for the FST was between 87.7% (95%CI: 76.8% to 93.9%) and 96.5% (95%CI: 87.9% to 99.5%) depending on definition of intermediate results; the WST was 84.2% (95%CI: 72.1% to 92.5%); and the CSG was between 68.8% (95%CI: 41.3% to 89.0%) and 93.8% (95%CI: 69.8% to 99.8%) when the test was performed on capillary or venous blood respectively. Sensitivity of FST and CSG (tested with venous blood) were comparable (p>0.05). The analysis of venous blood samples by the CSG yielded significantly higher results than FST and CSG performed on capillary blood (p<0.05). Sensitivity of the CSG varied depending on source of blood used (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The operational characteristics of the CSG were superior to all other test formats. Performance and operational characteristics of the CSG performed on venous blood suggest the test to be a good alternative to the FST.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia.Malar J. 2018 Jun 22;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2390-6. Malar J. 2018. PMID: 29929514 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a Novel Quantitative Test for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Bringing Quantitative Testing for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency Closer to the Patient.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Jan;100(1):213-221. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0612. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019. PMID: 30350771 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the Access Bio/CareStart rapid diagnostic test for the detection of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 13;16(12):e1002992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002992. eCollection 2019 Dec. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 31834890 Free PMC article.
-
Field trial evaluation of the performances of point-of-care tests for screening G6PD deficiency in Cambodia.PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e116143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116143. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25541721 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of quantitative point-of-care tests to measure G6PD activity: An individual participant data meta-analysis.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Mar 25;19(3):e0012864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012864. eCollection 2025 Mar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025. PMID: 40132008 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase status by fluorescent spot test and rapid diagnostic test in Lao PDR and Cambodia.Malar J. 2018 Jun 22;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2390-6. Malar J. 2018. PMID: 29929514 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh.PLoS One. 2017 Jan 25;12(1):e0169930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169930. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28121993 Free PMC article.
-
Defining the next generation of Plasmodium vivax diagnostic tests for control and elimination: Target product profiles.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Apr 3;11(4):e0005516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005516. eCollection 2017 Apr. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017. PMID: 28369085 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges for achieving safe and effective radical cure of Plasmodium vivax: a round table discussion of the APMEN Vivax Working Group.Malar J. 2017 Apr 5;16(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1784-1. Malar J. 2017. PMID: 28381261 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of a Novel Quantitative Test for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency: Bringing Quantitative Testing for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency Closer to the Patient.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Jan;100(1):213-221. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0612. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019. PMID: 30350771 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Manganelli G, Masullo U, Passarelli S, Filosa S. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency: disadvantages and possible benefits. Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets. 2013;13(1):73–82. - PubMed
-
- Hundsdoerfer P, Vetter B, Kulozik AE. Chronic haemolytic anaemia and glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Case report and review of the literature. Acta haematologica. 2002;108(2):102–5. - PubMed
-
- Beutler E. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. The New England journal of medicine. 1991;324(3):169–74. - PubMed
-
- Minucci A, Moradkhani K, Hwang MJ, Zuppi C, Giardina B, Capoluongo E. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) mutations database: review of the "old" and update of the new mutations. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 2012;48(3):154–65. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous