Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148175.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148175. eCollection 2016.

Costs and Benefits Associated with the MRSA Search and Destroy Policy in a Hospital in the Region Kennemerland, The Netherlands

Affiliations

Costs and Benefits Associated with the MRSA Search and Destroy Policy in a Hospital in the Region Kennemerland, The Netherlands

Dennis Souverein et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the costs and benefits of the MRSA Search and Destroy (S&D) policy between 2008 and 2013 in the Kennemer Gasthuis, a 400 bed teaching hospital in the region Kennemerland, the Netherlands.

Methods: A patient registration database was used to retrospectively calculate costs, including screening, isolation, follow-up, contact tracing, cleaning, treatment, deployment of extra healthcare workers, salary for an infection control practitioner (ICP) and service of isolation rooms. The estimated benefits (costs and lives when no MRSA S&D was applied) were based on a varying MRSA prevalence rate (up to 50%).

Results: When no MRSA S&D policy was applied, the additional costs and deaths due to MRSA bacteraemia were estimated to be € 1,388,907 and 33 respectively (at a MRSA prevalence rate of 50%). Currently, the total costs were estimated to be € 290,672 (€ 48,445 annually) and a MRSA prevalence rate of 17.3% was considered as break-even point. Between 2008 and 2013, a total of 576 high risk patients were screened for MRSA carriage, of whom 19 (3.3%) were found to be MRSA positive. Forty-nine patients (72.1%) were found unexpectedly.

Conclusions: Application of the MRSA S&D policy saves lives and money, although the high rate of unexpected MRSA cases is alarming.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Annually average costs per category for the MRSA Search and Destroy policy in the Kennemer Gasthuis, Netherlands.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Annual costs and benefits of the MRSA S&D policy with a changing MRSA prevalence rate.
The number above the MRSA prevalence rate describes the number of additional deaths per year at the associated prevalence rate.

References

    1. Stefani S, Chung DR, Lindsay JA, Friedrich AW, Kearns AM, Westh H, et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): global epidemiology and harmonisation of typing methods. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39(4): 273–82. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ECDC (01 Nov 2012). Summary of the latest data on antibiotic resistance in the European Union. ECDC. Available: http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/eaad/Documents/EARS-Net-summary-antibiotic-.... Accessed 1 December 2014.
    1. ISIS-AR. Available: http://www.ISIS-web.nl.
    1. Werkgroep Infectie Preventie. Meticilline-resistente Staphylococcus aureus WIP. 2012. Available: http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=rivmp:46603&type=org&disposition=....
    1. Bootsma MC, Diekmann O, Bonten MJ. Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(14): 5620–5. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms