Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 6:17:63.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0927-9.

Pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: effects on individual paraspinal muscles and lower back pain; a single-center, prospective study

Jae-Ryong Cha  1 , Yong-Chan Kim  2 , Chulyoung Jang  3 , Woo-Kyoung Yoo  4 , Ji Hao Cui  5
Affiliations

Pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: effects on individual paraspinal muscles and lower back pain; a single-center, prospective study

Jae-Ryong Cha et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports on the points at which the denervated multifidus and erector spinae muscles become reinnervated after pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Our study was designed to confirm reinnervation of denervated paraspinal muscles following pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion and to confirm alleviation of the patients' lower back pain (LBP).

Methods: In this prospective study, we enrolled 67 patients who had undergone pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion. The surgery had alleviated their leg pain, but the patients complained of LBP at the L3-5 level 3 months after the surgery. The patients were divided into two groups (I and II) according to the level at which pain was experienced. Paraspinal mapping scores were recorded preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale scores were determined. Regression analyses using a general linear model and a mixed model were performed.

Results: Pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion significantly denervated the multifidus and erector spinae not only in the surgical segment, but also in adjacent segments. Group I patients displayed reinnervation in the denervated erector spinae and multifidus muscles at 12 and 18 months, respectively. In contrast, group II showed reinnervation only in of the denervated erector spinae of the upper segment at 18 months, with no other areas of reinnervation. Postoperative LBP was significantly diminished at 12 months in group I and at 18 months in group II. There was also significantly less LBP at 6 months (prior to reinnervation of the paraspinal muscles).

Conclusions: The denervated multifidus and erector spinae muscles at L4-5, which had been denervated using pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion, were significantly reinnervated at 18 months postoperatively, whereas patients with denervation at L3-5 had only a tendency to be reinnervated at follow-up. Postoperative LBP in these patients was significantly diminished at the follow-up visits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Placement of the needle from the surgical level to adjacent segments from the posterior view of the lumbar spine
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in the multifidus muscle in group I. Pre-OP: preoperative; PO # 3 M, 6 M, 12,M, 18 M: 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes in the multifidus muscle in group II. Pre-OP: preoperative; PO # 3 M, 6 M, 12,M, 18 M: 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Changes in the erector spinae muscle in group I. Pre-OP: preoperative; PO # 3 M, 6 M, 12,M, 18 M: 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Changes in the erector spinae muscle in group II. Pre-OP: preoperative; PO # 3 M, 6 M, 12,M, 18 M: 3, 6, 12, 18 months postoperatively
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenius M, et al. Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:176–80. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kennelly KP, Stokes MJ. Pattern of asymmetry of paraspinal muscle slice in scoliosis examined by ultrasound imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:913–7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winter RB, Smith MD, Lonstein JE. Congenital scoliosis due to unilateral unsegmented bar: posterior spine fusion at age 12 months with 44-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:E52–5. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000106491.41473.E4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hyun SJ, Kim YB, Kim US, Park SW, Nam TK, Hong HJ, et al. Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22:646–51. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.4.646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:2640–50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199611150-00014. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms